The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chenhall, R. H. (2003) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00027-7 · Cited by 3,237
The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990) · American Economic Review · Cited by 2,615
Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-f · Cited by 2,559
In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition
Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470 · Cited by 2,490
Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory
Drazin, R., & de Ven, A. H. V. (1985) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392695 · Cited by 1,948
Management control systems as a package—opportunities, challenges and research directions
Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003 · Cited by 1,757
The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003 · Cited by 1,412
The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis
Otley, D. T. (1980) · Readings in Accounting for Management Control · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_5 · Cited by 1,113
Dekker, H. C. (2004) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(02)00056-9 · Cited by 1,035
Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis
Simons, R. (1987) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90024-9 · Cited by 986
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Evans, 2010, Nonfinancial performance measures and physician compensation, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22, 31, 10.2308/jmar.2010.22.1.31 · DOI
- Fisher, 1995, Contingency-based research on management control systems: Categorization by level of complexity, Journal of Accounting Literature, 14, 24
Cited by
The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014
Otley, D. (2016) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001 · Cited by 769
Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems
Bedford, D. S., Malmi, T., & Sandelin, M. (2016) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2016.04.002 · Cited by 328
Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2015) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.002 · Cited by 309
Self-citationOn the boundaries between intrafirm and interfirm management accounting research
Dekker, H. C. (2016) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2016.01.001 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Grabner, I., & Moers, F.
- Venue
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6-7
- Pages
- 407-419
- ISSN
- 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123299768
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 49.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aos.2013.09.002
- The paper
- Grabner, I., & Moers, F. (2013). Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.09.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
