An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although many different forms of fit have been deployed in the literature, very few researchers have acknowledged the problems of relating them to one another.
“Although many different forms of fit have been deployed in the literature, very few researchers have acknowledged the problems of relating them to one another (Gerdin and Greve, 2004; Cadez and Guilding, 2008).”
From A review of literature on contingency theory in managerial accounting (2012) · cites this paper as Cadez and Guilding, 2008
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941 · see citing works
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315749105 · Cited by 6,604 · see citing works
(2013) · Management Accounting · doi:10.4324/9780080938943-22 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.022 · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
A review of literature on contingency theory in managerial accounting
Islam, J. (2012) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT · doi:10.5897/ajbm11.2764 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cadez, S., & Guilding, C.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Guilding, Chris
- Venue
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 836-863
- ISSN
- 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127078159
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 33.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Accounting Organizations and Society (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
- Keywords
- strategic management accounting, contingency theory, strategic choice, market orientation, firm size, firm performance, large corporations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
