Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments

Callon, Michel·2009·Accounting, Organizations and Society

DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2008.04.003

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aos.2008.04.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability
Gond, J.-P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003 · Cited by 630
The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective
Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616655483 · Cited by 324
“For instance, the rationality–intuition tension can stem from the one-sided focus on rationality and analytical thinking among organizational decision makers (Cabantous & Gond, 2011; Callon, 2009).”
Making extinction calculable
Cuckston, T. (2018) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-10-2015-2264 · Cited by 65
Equity and Justice in Polycentric Climate Governance
Okereke, C. (2018) · Governing Climate Change · doi:10.1017/9781108284646.019 · Cited by 43

Authors: Callon, M.
Venue: Accounting, Organizations and Society
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2009-04
Volume: 34
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 535-548
ISSN: 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.04.003
OpenAlex: W1990943668
Cited by: 548
References: 0
FWCI: 38.68
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review