Cited by 65Environmental Conservation and ManagementConservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Making extinction calculable

Open access
Cuckston, Thomas·2018·Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species in achieving biodiversity conservation and preventing the extinction of species. The Red List is a calculative device that classifies species in terms of their exposure to the risk of extinction. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on theorising in the Social Studies of Finance literature to analyse the Red List in terms of how it frames a space of calculability for species extinction. The analysis then traces the ways that this framing has overflowed, creating conditions for calculative innovations, such that assemblages of humans and calculative devices (i.e. agencements) are constructed with collective capabilities to act to conserve biodiversity and prevent species extinctions. Findings This paper has traced three ways that the Red List frame has overflowed, leading to calculative innovations and the construction of new agencements. The overflow of relations between the quality of “extinction risk”, produced by the Red List, and other qualities, such as location, has created opportunities for conservationists to develop agencements capable of formulating conservation strategies. The overflow of relations between the identity of the “threatened species”, produced by the Red List, and other features of evaluated species, has created opportunities for conservationists to develop agencements capable of impelling participation in conservation efforts. The overflow of ecological relations between species, discarded by the Red List’s hierarchical metrology of extinction risk classifications, has created opportunities for conservationists to develop agencements capable of confronting society with the reality of an extinction crisis. Originality/value The paper contributes to the accounting for biodiversity literature by addressing its fundamental challenge: explaining how accounting can create conditions within society in which biodiversity conservation is made possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/aaaj-10-2015-2264

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cuckston T. Making extinction calculable. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 2018 Mar 19;31(3):849-874. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2015-2264

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuckston, T.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Cuckston, Thomas
Venue
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2018-03-19
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
849-874
ISSN
0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2785397723
Cited by
65
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
IUCN Red List, extinction risk assessment, biodiversity conservation, computability, social studies of finance, agencements, conservation strategies, threatened species, extinction crisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review