The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets
MacKenzie, D. (2006) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262134606.001.0001 · Cited by 1,766
The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility
Roberts, J. (2003) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508403010002004 · Cited by 411
Self-citation
Cited by
Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157 · Cited by 585
Organizational Transparency: Conceptualizations, Conditions, and Consequences
Albu, O. B., & Flyverbom, M. (2019) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650316659851 · Cited by 361
Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective
Järlström, M., Saru, E., & Vanhala, S. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3310-8 · Cited by 229
The loopholes of algorithmic public services: an “intelligent” accountability research agenda
Bracci, E. (2023) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-06-2022-5856 · Cited by 89
Contesting automated decisions
Bayamlioglu, E. (2018) · European Data Protection Law Review · doi:10.21552/edpl/2018/4/6 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, J.
- Venue
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 957-970
- ISSN
- 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067742095
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 58.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005
- The paper
- Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
