Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relationship between sustainable HRM and corporate performance extends beyond operational efficiency, contributing to business sustainability and industry leadership.
“The relationship between sustainable HRM and corporate performance extends beyond operational efficiency, contributing to business sustainability and industry leadership (Järlström et al., 2018).”
From Evaluation of the Sustainability of Organizational Welfare and Human Resources to Improving Long-Term Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Järlström et al., 2018
Organizations prioritizing long-term employee well-being are more likely to secure sustainable investment, as stakeholders increasingly assess businesses based on their social and governance commitments rather than just financial performance.
“Järlström et al. (2018) suggests that organizations prioritizing long-term employee well-being are more likely to secure sustainable investment, as stakeholders increasingly assess businesses based on their social and governance commitments rather than just financial performance.”
From Evaluation of the Sustainability of Organizational Welfare and Human Resources to Improving Long-Term Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Järlström et al. (2018)
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903 · see citing works
Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.12736076 · Cited by 2,996 · cited 5× · see citing works
“These practices may develop trust between employees and managers, if consistent messages are delivered to employees (e.g. Bowen and Ostroff 2004; Guerci and Pedrini 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialEhnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Contemporary developments in Green (environmental) HRM scholarship
Renwick, D. W. S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Muller-Camen, M., Redman, T., & Wilkinson, A. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1105844 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
The greening of strategic HRM scholarship
Jackson, S. E., & Seo, J. (2010) · Organization Management Journal · doi:10.1057/omj.2010.37 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Ehnert, I., & Harry, W. (2012) · management revu · doi:10.5771/0935-9915-2012-3-221 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Paradox as a Lens for Theorizing Sustainable HRM: Mapping and Coping with Paradoxes and Tensions
Ehnert, I. (2014) · CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37524-8_11 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability
Amrutha, V. N., & Geetha, S. N. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119131 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Systematic literature review on sustainable human resource management
Macke, J., & Genari, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.091 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
True transparency or mere decoupling? The study of selective disclosure in sustainability reporting
Roszkowska-Menkes, M., Aluchna, M., & Kamiński, B. (2024) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102700 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Ethical values in social economy for sustainable development
Rincon‐Roldan, F., & Lopez‐Cabrales, A. (2021) · Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics · doi:10.1111/apce.12300 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
R.A, R. A., Hardy, H., Asrul, A., Maslim, M., & Megawaty, M. (2025) · PARADOKS Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi · doi:10.57178/paradoks.v8i2.1157 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Järlström et al. (2018) suggests that organizations prioritizing long-term employee well-being are more likely to secure sustainable investment, as stakeholders increasingly assess businesses based on their social and governance commitments rather than just financial performance.”
- Authors
- Järlström, M., Saru, E., & Vanhala, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Vaasa (FI)
- University of Turku (FI)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Järlström, Maria
- Saru, Essi
- Vanhala, Sinikka
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2016-08-30
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 703-724
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2517999773
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 17.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Keywords
- sustainable human resource management, stakeholder salience, top management, green human resource management, employee well-being, justice and equality, profitability, legal and ethical responsibility, environmental responsibility, employee representatives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
