Classification Situations: Life- chances in the neoliberal era
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the case of eBay, reputation is not 'there' to facilitate exchange; rather, reputation is the result of evaluative infrastructure's disclosing, constituting an asset described as 'ubercapital'.
“In the case of eBay, reputation is not “there” to facilitate exchange; rather, reputation is the result of evaluative infrastructure's disclosing, constituting an asset which Fourcade and Healy (2013;2016) described as “ubercapital”-the form of capital arising from the “digital record” which evaluative infrastructure unfurls.”
From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Fourcade and Healy, 2013
Both Uber and LaZooz give rise to classification regimes that engender social identities, shaping life-chances.
“Both Uber and LaZooz give rise to classification regimes that engender social identities, shaping life-chances (Fourcade & Healy, 2013).”
From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Fourcade & Healy, 2013
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445 · see citing works
An introduction to market devices
Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., & Callon, M. (2007) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2007.00727.x · Cited by 795 · see citing works
National colors: racial classification and the state in Latin America
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.187143 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
Burrell, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715622512 · Cited by 3,196 · see citing works
Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287598 · Cited by 1,631 · see citing works
Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., & Mouritsen, J. (2017) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
The dark sides of people analytics: Reviewing the perils for organisations and employees
Giermindl, L. M., Strich, F., Christ, O., Leicht-Deobald, U., & Redzepi, A. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1927213 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing
Brayne, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190684099.001.0001 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches
Weinberg, L. (2022) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13196 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Big Data and algorithmic governance: The case of financial practices
Campbell-Verduyn, M., Goguen, M., & Porter, T. (2017) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2016.1216533 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation
Siler, K., & Larivière, V. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Do Algorithms Shape Character? Considering Algorithmic Ethical Subjectivation
Magalhães, J. C. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118768301 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fourcade, M., & Healy, K.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fourcade, Marion
- Venue
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 559-572
- ISSN
- 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799929805
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 23.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Accounting Organizations and Society (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- SPIRE (Sciences Po) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Princeton University
- University of Pennsylvania
- Harvard University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
- Keywords
- neoliberalism, credit scoring, credit risk, life chances, social stratification, credit markets, consumer credit, market conditions, social difference, creditworthiness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
