Cited by 99Global Financial Regulation and CrisesEthics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

Big Data and algorithmic governance: The case of financial practices

Campbell-Verduyn, Malcolm, Goguen, Marcel, Porter, Tony·2017·New Political Economy

Abstract

Big Data and algorithmic governance are transforming traditional institutions and media of transnational governance in manners that hold important implications for power, accountability and effectiveness. Drawing on actor-network theory, this paper contrasts utopian or dystopian views on the increasing presence of Big Data in contemporary financial practices. We scrutinise the emerging impacts of Big Data in the public governance of private banks in the Basel III arrangements, private governance of individual actors in credit scoring and anarchic competitive governance of markets in high-frequency trading. Our findings reveal varied and emergent forms of governance through, with and by algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13563467.2016.1216533

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell-Verduyn, M., Goguen, M., & Porter, T.
Affiliations
  • Department of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • McMaster University (CA)
Venue
New Political Economy
Published
2016-08-10
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
219-236
ISSN
  • 1356-3467 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9923
OpenAlex
W2481128301
Cited by
99
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410-2011-2376)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Regulation and Crises
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
big data, algorithmic governance, financial practices, Basel III, credit scoring, high-frequency trading, private banks, public governance, private governance, power and accountability, actor-network theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review