Cited by 188Music and Audio ProcessingSpeech Recognition and SynthesisAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Spectral images based environmental sound classification using CNN with meaningful data augmentation

Mushtaq, Zohaib, Su, Shun-Feng, Tran, Quoc-Viet·2021·Applied Acoustics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107581

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mushtaq, Z., Su, S.-F., & Tran, Q.-V.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Mushtaq, Zohaib
Venue
Applied Acoustics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
172
Pages
107581
ISSN
0003-682X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082878506
Cited by
188
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Acoustics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
environmental sound classification, Mel spectrogram, spectrogram images, convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, data augmentation, audio feature extraction, ESC-10, ESC-50, ResNet-152, DenseNet-161

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review