The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PdIn intermetallic nanoparticles for the Hydrogenation of CO2 to Methanol
Open accessAbstract
Direct hydrogenation of CO 2 to methanol could offer significant environmental benefits, if efficient catalysts can be developed. Here, bimetallic Pd-In nanoparticles show good performance as catalysts for this reaction. Unsupported nanoparticles are synthesised by the thermal decomposition of Pd(acetate) 2 and In(acetate) 3 precursors in a high boiling point solvent (squalane), followed by reduction using dilute H 2 gas (210 °C). Adjusting the ratio of the two metallic precursors allow access to 5–10 nm nanoparticles with different phase compositions, including metallic Pd(0), In 2 O 3 and intermetallic PdIn. Liquid phase methanol synthesis experiments (50 bar, 210 °C, H 2 :CO 2 = 3:1) identify the intermetallic PdIn nanoparticles as the most efficient. The catalysts exhibit around 70% higher methanol rates (normalised to the overall molar metal content) compared to the conventional heterogeneous Cu/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 catalyst (900 and 540 μmol mmol PdInorCuZnAl −1 h −1 , respectively). In addition, the optimum Pd/In catalyst shows an improved methanol selectivity over the whole temperature range studied (190–270 °C), reaching >80% selectivity at 270 °C, compared to only 45% for the reference Cu/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 catalyst. Experiments showed an improvement in stability; the methanol production rate declined by 20% after 120 h run for the optimum PdIn-based compared with 30% for the Cu/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 catalyst (after 25 h). The optimum catalyst consists of ∼8 nm nanoparticles comprising a surface In-enriched PdIn intermetallic phase as characterised by XRD, HR-TEM, STEM-EDX and XPS. Post-catalysis analysis of the optimum catalyst shows that the same PdIn bimetallic phase is retained with only a slight increase in the nanoparticle size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thermochemical CO2 Hydrogenation to Single Carbon Products: Scientific and Technological Challenges
Roy, S., Cherevotan, A., & Peter, S. C. (2018) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00740 · Cited by 512
Frei, M. S., Mondelli, C., García-Muelas, R., Kley, K. S., Puértolas, B., López, N., Safonova, O. V., Stewart, J. A., Curulla Ferré, D., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11349-9 · Cited by 469
Novel Heterogeneous Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation to Liquid Fuels
Gao, P., Zhang, L., Li, S., Zhou, Z., & Sun, Y. (2020) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c00976 · Cited by 361
Dang, S., Yang, H., Gao, P., Wang, H., Li, X., Wei, W., & Sun, Y. (2019) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.021 · Cited by 355
Advances in the Design of Heterogeneous Catalysts and Thermocatalytic Processes for CO2 Utilization
De, S., Dokania, A., Ramirez, A., & Gascon, J. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c04273 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- García-Trenco, A., Regoutz, A., White, E. R., Payne, D. J., Shaffer, M. S. P., & Williams, C. K.
- Venue
- Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 220
- Pages
- 9-18
- ISSN
- 0926-3373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2738472760
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PdIn intermetallic nanoparticles for the Hydrogenation of CO2 to Methanol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.069
- The paper
- García-Trenco, A., Regoutz, A., White, E. R., Payne, D. J., Shaffer, M. S. P., & Williams, C. K. (2018). PdIn intermetallic nanoparticles for the Hydrogenation of CO2 to Methanol. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.