Cited by 60Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAgricultural Engineering and MechanizationAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Review on crucial parameters of silage quality

Open access
Mohd-Setapar, S.H., Abd-Talib, N., Aziz, R.·2012·APCBEE Procedia

Abstract

The main objective of this review is to investigate the effects of temperature of fermentation environment, chopped length of the forages and fermentation period on the quality of silage. The problem in this agricultural research industry is that there is a lack of interest in doing the investigation by cross-relating other available knowledge in this field. Fermentation process of silage can also apply the concept of chemical processing by investigating the parameters related to the process, like those mentioned above. From this review, it was found that temperature and chopped length do not significantly affect the quality of silage produced but the fermentation period must be considered as a crucial parameter. Recommendation is that further investigation on fermentation period by different type of forage must be considered and the effect of additive on the completion of fermentation process must also be investigated in order to save time, cost and to optimize nutrient content in silage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.06.053

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Malaysia To Minimise Dependence On Imports Through Reciprocal Investment. In Bernama, Edition Malaysia: Malaysia National News Agency 2011.
  2. Schroeder JW. Silage Fermentation and Preservation. In Edition South Dakota: North Dakota State University 2004; 1-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohd-Setapar, S. H., Abd-Talib, N., & Aziz, R.
Affiliations
University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Venue
APCBEE Procedia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012
Volume
3
Pages
99-103
ISSN
2212-6708 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063386961
Cited by
60
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
APCBEE Procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
silage quality, fermentation temperature, fermentation time, silage fermentation, silage additives, forage preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review