The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis
Abstract
With fast economic development, industrialization and urbanization, China faces increasing pressures on carbon emission reduction, and especially on air pollutants (SO2, NOx, PM) reduction, particularly the notorious haze issue caused by air pollution in recent years. Pursuing co-benefits is an effective approach to simultaneously respond to both carbon and air pollutant problems. In this paper, the AIM/CGE (Asia–Pacific Integrated Assessment Model/Computational General Equilibrium) model and GAINS (Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies)-China model are combined together to project future CO2 and air pollutants emissions in China, as well as reduction costs and co-benefit effects. Considering implementation of carbon mitigation policy and air pollutant mitigation technologies, four scenarios (S1, S2, S3 and S4) are analyzed. Results indicate that by implementing both carbon and air pollutant mitigation (S4), CO2 emission per GDP can be reduced by 41% by 2020, compared with the 2005 level, and SO2, NOx and PM2.5 emissions would change by a factor 0.8, 1.26 and 1.0 of the 2005 level, respectively in 2030. The real co-benefits of emission reductions (S2 minus S4) for SO2, NOx and PM2.5 are 2.4Mt, 2.1Mt and 0.3Mt in 2020, and the corresponding cost reduction co-benefits are 4, 0.11, and 0.8billion €, respectively. Provincial disparity analysis reveals that regions with higher co-benefits are those with higher GDP such as Guangdong, Shandong and Jiangsu, energy production bases such as Inner Mongolia and Shanxi, low coal quality provinces such as Sichuan (for SO2), and industrial base provinces such as Liaoning. Cost-effectiveness is finally discussed for policy implications, which suggests that investment in less developed western regions is more cost-effective and easier in reducing CO2 or air pollutant emissions than in developed eastern regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?
Hepburn, C., O’Callaghan, B., Stern, N., Stiglitz, J., & Zenghelis, D. (2020) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/graa015 · Cited by 771
Economic Impacts from PM2.5 Pollution-Related Health Effects in China: A Provincial-Level Analysis
Xie, Y., Dai, H., Dong, H., Hanaoka, T., & Masui, T. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05576 · Cited by 373
Self-citationComparison of health and economic impacts of PM2.5 and ozone pollution in China
Xie, Y., Dai, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., Hanaoka, T., & Masui, T. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.075 · Cited by 346
Self-citationResearch on influencing factors of environmental pollution in China: A spatial econometric analysis
Liu, K., & Lin, B. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.194 · Cited by 325
Gao, J., Woodward, A., Vardoulakis, S., Kovats, S., Wilkinson, P., Li, L., Xu, L., Li, J., Yang, J., Li, J., et al. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.231 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, H., Dai, H., Dong, L., Fujita, T., Geng, Y., Klimont, Z., Inoue, T., Bunya, S., Fujii, M., & Masui, T.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 165-174
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007310192
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.020
- The paper
- Dong, H., Dai, H., Dong, L., Fujita, T., Geng, Y., Klimont, Z., Inoue, T., Bunya, S., Fujii, M., & Masui, T. (2015). Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.