Cited by 269Integrated Energy Systems OptimizationElectric Power System OptimizationPower Systems and Renewable Energy

Least-cost options for integrating intermittent renewables in low-carbon power systems

Open access
Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd, van den Broek, Machteld, Zappa, William, Turkenburg, Wim C., Faaij, André·2016·Applied Energy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.090

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Energy storage is paramount in electric and hybrid vehicles, in green but intermittent energy sources, and in smart grids.

    “Energy storage is paramount in electric and hybrid vehicles, in green but intermittent energy sources, and in smart grids in general.”

    From Lithium recovery from brines: A vital raw material for green energies with a potential environmental impact in its mining and processing (2018) · cites this paper as Brouwer et al., 2016

    The Introduction says intermittent renewables increase the need for power-system flexibility, and Appendix G.3 discusses storage capacity alongside wind, solar, and electric vehicles. But the Conclusion finds that electricity storage increased system costs in the systems studied; the paper does not establish that storage is paramount for electric or hybrid vehicles, intermittent renewables, or smart grids generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]1. IPCC. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, editors. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
  2. [2]2. IPCC. Climate change 2014, mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
  3. [43]43. Oxera. Discount rates for low-carbon and renewable generation technologies. Oxford, United Kingdom; 2011.
  4. [56]56. Awerbuch S, Yang S. Efficient electricity generating portfolios for Europe: maximising energy security and climate change mitigation. EIB papers, vol. 12, no. 2, ISSN 0257-7755; 2007.
  5. [57]57. Cramton P, Ockenfels A. Ökonomik und Design von Kapazitätsmärkten im Stromsektor. Z. Energiewirtschaft 2012;36:113-34.
  6. [62]62. Finon D. The efficiency of policy instruments for the deployment of CCS as a large-sized technology. Electricity policy research group working paper 1035. UK: University of Cambridge; 2010.
  7. [69]69. Leij H van der. A quantitative analysis of current and future electricity demand patterns in Europe. Master thesis. The Netherlands: Utrecht University; 2015.
  8. [77]77. Cohen S. A techno-economic plant-and grid-level assessment of flexible CO 2 capture. PhD dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin; 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brouwer, A. S., van den Broek, M., Zappa, W., Turkenburg, W. C., & Faaij, A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
161
Pages
48-74
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1952114538
Cited by
269
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Dutch government
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Power Systems and Renewable Energy
Keywords
intermittent renewable energy integration, low-carbon power systems, CO2 emission reduction, demand response, gas-fired power plants, carbon capture and storage, interconnection capacity, renewable energy curtailment, electricity storage, compressed air energy storage, battery energy storage, revenue gap, energy-only market

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review