The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application
Open accessAbstract
This study aims to assess the environmental impacts related to the provision of 1kWh to the grid from wind power in Europe and to suggest how life cycle assessment can inform technology development and system planning. Four representative power plants onshore (with 2.3 and 3.2MW turbines) and offshore (4.0 and 6.0MW turbines) with 2015 state-of-the-art technology data provided by Siemens Wind Power were assessed. The energy payback time was found to be less than 1year for all technologies. The emissions of greenhouse gases amounted to less than 7g CO2-eq/kWh for onshore and 11g CO2-eq/kWh for offshore. Climate change impacts were found to be a good indicator for overall hotspot identification however attention should also be drawn to human toxicity and impacts from respiratory inorganics. The overall higher impact of offshore plants, compared to onshore ones, is mainly due to larger high-impact material requirements for capital infrastructure. In both markets the bigger turbines with more advanced direct drive generator technology is shown to perform better than the smaller geared ones. Capital infrastructure is the most impactful life cycle stage across impacts. It accounts for more than 79% and 70% of climate change impacts onshore and offshore respectively. The end-of-life treatment could lead to significant savings due to recycling, ca. 20–30% for climate change. In the manufacturing stage the impacts due to operations at the case company do not exceed 1% of the total life cycle impacts. This finding highlights the shared responsibility across multiple stakeholders and calls for collaborative efforts for comprehensive environmental management across organizations in the value chain. Real life examples are given in order to showcase how LCA results can inform decisions, e.g. for concept and product development and supply chain management. On a systems level the results can be used by energy planners when comparing with alternative energy sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Current developments and future prospects of offshore wind and ocean energy
Esteban, M., & Leary, D. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.011 · Cited by 389
Cited by
Campos-Guzmán, V., García-Cáscales, M. S., Espinosa, N., & Urbina, A. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.031 · Cited by 281
Nian, V., Liu, Y., & Zhong, S. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.042 · Cited by 58
Developing onshore wind farms in Aotearoa New Zealand: Carbon and energy footprints
Pincelli, I. P., Hinkley, J., & Brent, A. (2025) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03036758.2024.2344785 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonou, A., Laurent, A., & Olsen, S. I.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 180
- Pages
- 327-337
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2476107020
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.058
- The paper
- Bonou, A., Laurent, A., & Olsen, S. I. (2016). Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.