Cited by 14Environmental Impact and SustainabilityWind Energy Research and DevelopmentPhotovoltaic Systems and Sustainability

Developing onshore wind farms in Aotearoa New Zealand: Carbon and energy footprints

Open access
Pincelli, Isabella Pimentel, Hinkley, Jim, Brent, Alan·2025·Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recognition of deeper insights into the implications of wind farm deployments, this paper addresses the need for an updated Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for onshore wind generation systems, using 4.3 MW wind turbines and direct drive permanent magnet synchronous generators. The environmental and energy performances were estimated through an LCA for an onshore wind plant under construction in Aotearoa New Zealand with a total nameplate capacity of 176 MW. This study used real construction data showing literature data overestimates civil works and underestimates transportation contributions in the wind farm footprint. Further, different end‐of‐life management alternatives for turbine blades are analysed: landfill, mechanical recycling, and chemical recycling. The results indicate a carbon footprint of 10.8–9.7 gCO 2eq /kWh, a greenhouse gas payback time of 1.5–1.7 years for avoided combined cycle gas turbines, and an energy payback time of 0.4–0.5 years, in which the chemical recycling of the blades is the lower emission solution overall. The outcomes underscore the environmental efficiency of onshore wind farms and their important role in the energy transition. Notably, the manufacturing of wind turbines is the primary contributor to the carbon and energy footprints, highlighting a critical area for targeted environmental mitigation strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03036758.2024.2344785

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The carbon intensities of electricity from photovoltaics and onshore wind are estimated at approximately 20-80 gCO2-eq/kWh and 10-30 gCO2-eq/kWh, respectively, which are substantially lower than the EU grid average of around 230-280 gCO2-eq/kWh but are not negligible and must be integrated into well-to-wheel emission analyses.

    “For instance, the carbon intensities of electricity from photovoltaics and onshore wind are estimated at approximately 20-80 gCO 2 -eq/kWh and 10-30 gCO 2 -eq/kWh, respectively, which, while substantially lower than the EU grid average of around 230-280 gCO 2 -eq/kWh, depending on fuel content, is not negligible and must be integrated into WtW emission analyses [3,9,314,315].”

    From Biofuels, E-Fuels, and Waste-Derived Fuels: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [314]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fthenakis V. 2017. Life cycle assessment of photovoltaics. In: A. Reinders, P. Verlinden, W. Sark, A. Freundlich, editors. Photovoltaic solar energy supporting methods and tools. West Sussex: Wiley; p. 646– 657.
  2. Pincelli IP, Brent AC, Hinkley JT, Sutherland R. 2024. Scaling up solar and wind electricity: a disruptive scenario for Aotearoa New Zealand. Royal Society of New Zealand (to be published). PMC12054581 40337492

Cited by

Authors
Pincelli, I. P., Hinkley, J., & Brent, A.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Pincelli, Isabella Pimentel
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-05-14
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1005-1027
ISSN
  • 0303-6758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1175-8899
OpenAlex
W4396887084
Cited by
14
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Victoria University of Wellington (Doctoral Scholarship)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Wind Energy Research and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Keywords
onshore wind farms, carbon footprint, energy footprint, life cycle assessment, wind turbines, direct-drive permanent magnet synchronous generator, chemical recycling, mechanical recycling, landfilling, energy payback time, energy transition, New Zealand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review