Techno-economic analysis of producing solid biofuels and biochar from forest residues using portable systems
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The high cost of inbound and outbound logistics is one of the main obstacles to the commercialization of the biochar industry and its growth.
“The high cost of inbound (i.e., biomass) and outbound (i.e., biochar) logistics is one of the main obstacles to the commercialization of the biochar industry and its growth.”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
The wide geographic distribution of forest residues usually causes high costs of logistics operations such as collection, loading, transportation, unloading, and storage.
“Considering the low price of forest residues, they are considered as a potential feedstock for biochar; however, the wide geographic distribution of forest residues usually causes high costs of logistics operations, e.g., collection, loading, transportation, unloading, and storage [4,11,12].”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Use of portable systems for conversion of forest residues to biomass-based products at a point close to supply regions can potentially reduce biomass logistics costs.
“The use of portable systems for the conversion of forest residues to various biomass-based products at a point close to the supply regions can potentially reduce the biomass logistics costs [4,15].”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
Roberts, K. G., Gloy, B. A., Joseph, S., Scott, N. R., & Lehmann, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902266r · Cited by 1,243 · see citing works
Badger, P., Badger, S., Puettmann, M., Steele, P., & Cooper, J. (2010) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.6.1.34-47 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The Economics of Biomass Logistics and Conversion Facility Mobility: An Oregon Case Study
Berry, M. D., & Sessions, J. (2018) · Applied Engineering in Agriculture · doi:10.13031/aea.12383 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multifunctional applications of biochar beyond carbon storage
Bolan, N., Hoang, S. A., Beiyuan, J., Gupta, S., Hou, D., Karakoti, A., Joseph, S., Jung, S., Kim, K.-H., Kirkham, M. B., et al. (2022) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1080/09506608.2021.1922047 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
A techno-economic analysis of biochar production and the bioeconomy for orchard biomass
Nematian, M., Keske, C., & Ng'ombe, J. N. (2021) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.014 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Angulo-Mosquera, L. S., Alvarado-Alvarado, A. A., Rivas-Arrieta, M. J., Cattaneo, C. R., Rene, E. R., & García-Depraect, O. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148816 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Waheed, A., Xu, H., Qiao, X., Aili, A., Yiremaikebayi, Y., Haitao, D., & Muhammad, M. (2025) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107531 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Perspectives of Engineered Biochar for Environmental Applications: A Review
Haghighi Mood, S., Pelaez-Samaniego, M. R., & Garcia-Perez, M. (2022) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01201 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Struhs, E., Mirkouei, A., You, Y., & Mohajeri, A. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115782 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Bergman, R., Sahoo, K., Englund, K., & Mousavi-Avval, S. H. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15041559 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationSchipfer, F., Pfeiffer, A., & Hoefnagels, R. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15020433 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Zhang, Z., & Lan, K. (2022) · Journal of Renewable Materials · doi:10.32604/jrm.2022.017506 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Asare, F., Gazo, R., Mo, J., Haviarova, E., Quesada, H. J., Rahmani, S. R., Owusu, F. W., Saraugi, S. S., & Routray, W. (2027) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2026.135686
- Authors
- Sahoo, K., Bilek, E., Bergman, R., & Mani, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Forest Products Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sahoo, Kamalakanta
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 235
- Pages
- 578-590
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899560818
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Energy (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- forest residues, solid biofuels, biochar, torrefaction, minimum selling price, fuel treatment, forest fire prevention, cost reduction strategies, carbon credits, greenhouse gas emissions, logging residues
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
