The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short-term forecasting and uncertainty analysis of wind turbine power based on long short-term memory network and Gaussian mixture model
Open accessAbstract
Wind power plays a leading role in the development of renewable energy. However, the random nature of wind turbine power and its associated uncertainty create challenges in dispatching this power effectively in the power system, which can result in unnecessary curtailment of the wind turbine power. Improving the accuracy of wind turbine power forecasting is an effective measure for resolving such problems. This study uses a deep learning network to forecast the wind turbine power based on a long short-term memory network (LSTM) algorithm and uses the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to analyze the error distribution characteristics of short-term wind turbine power forecasting. The LSTM algorithm is used to forecast the power and uncertainties for three wind turbines within a wind farm. According to numerical weather prediction (NWP) data and historical power data for three turbines, the forecasting accuracy of the turbine with the largest number of training samples is the best of the three. For one of the turbines, the LSTM, radial basis function (RBF), wavelet, deep belief network (DBN), back propagation neural networks (BPNN), and Elman neural network (ELMAN) have been used to forecast the wind turbine power. This study compares the results and demonstrates that LSTM can greatly improve the forecasting accuracy. Moreover, this study obtains different confidence intervals for the three units according to the GMM, mixture density neural network (MDN), and relevance vector machine (RVM) model results. The LSTM method is shown to have higher accuracy and faster convergence than the other methods. However, the GMM method has better performance and evaluation than other methods and thus has practical application value for wind turbine power dispatching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yaşlı Kadınlarda Üreme Sağlığı
Kokanalı, D., & Engin Üstün, Y. (n.d.) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · Cited by 170,090
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 22,066
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 · Cited by 19,343
Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means
Jain, A. K. (2010) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011 · Cited by 9,368
Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM
Gers, F. A., Schmidhuber, J., & Cummins, F. (2000) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976600300015015 · Cited by 4,823
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Neal, R. M. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s518 · Cited by 4,571
Gilles, J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2013.2265222 · Cited by 2,210
LSTM network: a deep learning approach for short‐term traffic forecast
Zhao, Z., Chen, W., Wu, X., Chen, P. C. Y., & Liu, J. (2017) · IET Intelligent Transport Systems · doi:10.1049/iet-its.2016.0208 · Cited by 1,834
Improved complete ensemble EMD: A suitable tool for biomedical signal processing
Colominas, M. A., Schlotthauer, G., & Torres, M. E. (2014) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2014.06.009 · Cited by 1,471
Cited by
A Critical Review of Wind Power Forecasting Methods—Past, Present and Future
Hanifi, S., Liu, X., Lin, Z., & Lotfian, S. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13153764 · Cited by 435
Ghimire, S., Deo, R. C., Raj, N., & Mi, J. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113541 · Cited by 394
A review and taxonomy of wind and solar energy forecasting methods based on deep learning
Alkhayat, G., & Mehmood, R. (2021) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100060 · Cited by 312
Lipu, M. S. H., Miah, M. S., Hannan, M. A., Hussain, A., Sarker, M. R., Ayob, A., Saad, M. H. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3097102 · Cited by 121
Data analytics of social media publicity to enhance household waste management
Jiang, P., Fan, Y. V., & Klemeš, J. J. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105146 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Yan, J., Infield, D., Liu, Y., & Lien, F.-S.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 241
- Pages
- 229-244
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2922403949
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 13.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short-term forecasting and uncertainty analysis of wind turbine power based on long short-term memory network and Gaussian mixture model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.044
- The paper
- Zhang, J., Yan, J., Infield, D., Liu, Y., & Lien, F.-S. (2019). Short-term forecasting and uncertainty analysis of wind turbine power based on long short-term memory network and Gaussian mixture model. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.