The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review and taxonomy of wind and solar energy forecasting methods based on deep learning
Open accessAbstract
Renewable energy is essential for planet sustainability. Renewable energy output forecasting has a significant impact on making decisions related to operating and managing power systems. Accurate prediction of renewable energy output is vital to ensure grid reliability and permanency and reduce the risk and cost of the energy market and systems. Deep learning's recent success in many applications has attracted researchers to this field and its promising potential is manifested in the richness of the proposed methods and the increasing number of publications. To facilitate further research and development in this area, this paper provides a review of deep learning-based solar and wind energy forecasting research published during the last five years discussing extensively the data and datasets used in the reviewed works, the data pre-processing methods, deterministic and probabilistic methods, and evaluation and comparison methods. The core characteristics of all the reviewed works are summarised in tabular forms to enable methodological comparisons. The current challenges in the field and future research directions are given. The trends show that hybrid forecasting models are the most used in this field followed by Recurrent Neural Network models including Long Short-Term Memory and Gated Recurrent Unit, and in the third place Convolutional Neural Networks. We also find that probabilistic and multistep ahead forecasting methods are gaining more attention. Moreover, we devise a broad taxonomy of the research using the key insights gained from this extensive review, the taxonomy we believe will be vital in understanding the cutting-edge and accelerating innovation in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A review
Voyant, C., Notton, G., Kalogirou, S., Nivet, M.-L., Paoli, C., Motte, F., & Fouilloy, A. (2017) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.12.095 · Cited by 1,836
Ahmed, R., Sreeram, V., Mishra, Y., & Arif, M. D. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109792 · Cited by 1,259
A review of deep learning for renewable energy forecasting
Wang, H., Lei, Z., Zhang, X., Zhou, B., & Peng, J. (2019) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111799 · Cited by 1,193
Hourly day-ahead solar irradiance prediction using weather forecasts by LSTM
Qing, X., & Niu, Y. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.177 · Cited by 950
Deep learning based ensemble approach for probabilistic wind power forecasting
Wang, H.-Z., Li, G.-Q., Wang, G.-B., Peng, J.-C., Jiang, H., & Liu, Y.-T. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.111 · Cited by 753
Accurate photovoltaic power forecasting models using deep LSTM-RNN
Abdel-Nasser, M., & Mahmoud, K. (2019) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-017-3225-z · Cited by 752
Wang, F., Xuan, Z., Zhen, Z., Li, K., Wang, T., & Shi, M. (2020) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112766 · Cited by 639
Deep Learning for solar power forecasting — An approach using AutoEncoder and LSTM Neural Networks
Gensler, A., Henze, J., Sick, B., & Raabe, N. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) · doi:10.1109/smc.2016.7844673 · Cited by 614
State of the Art of Machine Learning Models in Energy Systems, a Systematic Review
Mosavi, A., Salimi, M., Faizollahzadeh Ardabili, S., Rabczuk, T., Shamshirband, S., & Varkonyi-Koczy, A. R. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12071301 · Cited by 578
Wang, K., Qi, X., & Liu, H. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113315 · Cited by 574
Cited by
Microgrid Digital Twins: Concepts, Applications, and Future Trends
Bazmohammadi, N., Madary, A., Vasquez, J. C., Mohammadi, H. B., Khan, B., Wu, Y., & Guerrero, J. M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3138990 · Cited by 233
Lipu, M. S. H., Miah, M. S., Hannan, M. A., Hussain, A., Sarker, M. R., Ayob, A., Saad, M. H. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3097102 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Alkhayat, G., & Mehmood, R.
- Venue
- Energy and AI
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 100060
- ISSN
- 2666-5468 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3135523675
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 115
- FWCI
- 14.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review and taxonomy of wind and solar energy forecasting methods based on deep learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100060
- The paper
- Alkhayat, G., & Mehmood, R. (2021). A review and taxonomy of wind and solar energy forecasting methods based on deep learning. Energy and AI. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.