Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 168 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of non-probabilistic machine learning-based state of health estimation techniques for Lithium-ion battery

Open access
Sui, Xin, He, Shan, Vilsen, Søren B., Meng, Jinhao, Teodorescu, Remus, Stroe, Daniel-Ioan·2021·Applied Energy

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries are used in a wide range of applications including energy storage systems, electric transportations, and portable electronic devices. Accurately obtaining the batteries’ state of health (SOH) is critical to prolong the service life of the battery and ensure the safe and reliable operation of the system. Machine learning (ML) technology has attracted increasing attention due to its competitiveness in studying the behavior of complex nonlinear systems. With the development of big data and cloud computing, ML technology has a big potential in battery SOH estimation. In this paper, the five most studied types of ML algorithms for battery SOH estimation are systematically reviewed. The basic principle of each algorithm is rigorously derived followed by flow charts with a unified form, and the advantages and applicability of different methods are compared from a theoretical perspective. Then, the ML-based SOH estimation methods are comprehensively compared from following three aspects: the estimation performance of various algorithms under five performance metrics, the publication trend obtained by counting the publications in the past ten years, and the training modes considering the feature extraction and selection methods. According to the comparison results, it can be concluded that amongst these methods, support vector machine and artificial neural network algorithms are still research hotspots. Deep learning has great potential in estimating battery SOH under complex aging conditions especially when big data is available. Moreover, the ensemble learning method provides an emerging alternative trading-off between data size and accuracy. Finally, the outlooks of the research on future ML-based battery SOH estimation methods are closed, hoping to provide some inspiration when applying ML methods to battery SOH estimation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117346

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 168 references

Cited by

See all 409

Metadata

Authors
Sui, X., He, S., Vilsen, S. B., Meng, J., Teodorescu, R., & Stroe, D.-I.
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
300
Pages
117346
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3179571438
Cited by
409
References
168
FWCI
21.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of non-probabilistic machine learning-based state of health estimation techniques for Lithium-ion battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117346
The paper
Sui, X., He, S., Vilsen, S. B., Meng, J., Teodorescu, R., & Stroe, D.-I. (2021). A review of non-probabilistic machine learning-based state of health estimation techniques for Lithium-ion battery. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117346

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.