Cited by 116Global Energy and Sustainability ResearchSustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisGlobal Energy Security and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 220 of the 220 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peak oil and the low-carbon energy transition: A net-energy perspective

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117843

Cites

220 of 220 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 220 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Michaux, 2020, Oil from a critical raw material perspective, Geol Surv Finland
  2. Fuller, 1940, World energy, Fortune
  3. Fustier, 2016, Global oil supply: Will mature field declines drive the next supply crunch?, HSBC Global Res
  4. Andrews, 2015, Oil prophets: looking at world oil studies over time, Oil Age, 1, 41
  5. Campbell, 2015, The oil age in an historical perspective, Oil Age, 1, 1
  6. Campbell, 2017, Oil reserve estimation and the impact of oil price, Oil Age, 3, 1
  7. Hugues, 2019, How long will the shale revolution last?, Post Carbon Institute
  8. Hall, 2016, EROI ratios: implications for energy forecasting and long term prosperity, Oil Age, 2, 29
  9. Campbell, 2015, Modelling oil and gas depletion, Oil Age, 1, 9
  10. Laherrère, 2016, Oil forecasting: data sources and data problems – Part 1, Oil Age, 2, 23
  11. Laherrère, 2016, Oil forecasting: data sources and data problems – Part 2, Oil Age, 2, 7
  12. Laherrère, 2017, Oil forecasting: data sources and data problems – Part 3, Oil Age, 3, 7
  13. Smith, 2015, Forecasting oil & gas supply and activity, Oil Age, 1, 35
  14. Laherrère, 2020, Club de nice XVIII forum 1er décembre 2020. Bilan et perspectives énergétiques mondiales. Evolution de l’énergie : pics passés, présents et futurs, ASPO France
  15. McGlade, 2015, An introduction to the bottom-up economic and geological oil field production model ‘BUEGO’, Oil Age, 1, 9
  16. Parrique, 2019, Decoupling debunked – evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability, Eur Environ Bureau

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Delannoy, L., Longaretti, P.-Y., Murphy, D. J., & Prados, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • St. Lawrence University (US)
Corresponding author
Delannoy, Louis
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
304
Pages
117843
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3200145194
Cited by
116
References
220
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Energy (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › General Energy › Global Energy Security and Policy
Keywords
peak oil, low-carbon transition, net energy, energy return on investment, unconventional oil, energy production costs, energy supply and demand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review