Is green growth possible?
Open accessAbstract
The notion of green growth has emerged as a dominant policy response to climate change and ecological breakdown. Green growth theory asserts that continued economic expansion is compatible with our planet’s ecology, as technological change and substitution will allow us to absolutely decouple GDP growth from resource use and carbon emissions. This claim is now assumed in national and international policy, including in the Sustainable Development Goals. But empirical evidence on resource use and carbon emissions does not support green growth theory. Examining relevant studies on historical trends and model-based projections, we find that: (1) there is no empirical evidence that absolute decoupling from resource use can be achieved on a global scale against a background of continued economic growth, and (2) absolute decoupling from carbon emissions is highly unlikely to be achieved at a rate rapid enough to prevent global warming over 1.5°C or 2°C, even under optimistic policy conditions. We conclude that green growth is likely to be a misguided objective, and that policymakers need to look toward alternative strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 111 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
None of the three major green growth reports provide evidence that absolute decoupling is possible.
“None of the three reports on green growth provide any evidence that it is.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
European OECD nations achieved absolute decoupling, growing GDP while reducing DMC.
“The report also indicates that European OECD nations have achieved absolute decoupling, growing GDP while reducing DMC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Many nations have achieved relative decoupling, with GDP growing faster than DMC.
“By this metric, it appears that many nations have achieved relative decoupling, with GDP growing at a rate faster than DMC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is no empirical evidence that absolute decoupling from resource use can be achieved on a global scale against continued economic growth.
“there is no empirical evidence that absolute decoupling from resource use can be achieved on a global scale against a background of continued economic growth”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Krausmann et al. show that during the 20th century GDP grew at 3% per year while resource use grew at 2% per year, a relative decoupling of about 1% per year.
“Krausmann et al (2009) show that during the 20 th century GDP grew at a faster rate (3 per cent per year) than resource use (2 per cent per year).This represents a relative decoupling or dematerialization of GDP growth, at a rate of about 1 per cent per year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Krausmann et al 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Wiedmann et al. found that the only significant cases of relative decoupling of GDP from material footprint were China, India, and South Africa.
“According to Wiedmann et al (2015), the only significant cases of relative decoupling of GDP from material footprint have been China, India and South Africa.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wiedmann et al 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Global resource use has been rising on a steady trajectory.
“On a global scale, resource use has been rising on a steady trajectory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
UNEP's reference scenario projects global resource use rising from 85 billion tons in 2015 to 186 billion tons by 2050.
“Their reference scenario, extrapolating from existing trends, shows that global resource use rises steadily from 85 billion tons in 2015 to 186 billion tons by 2050”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UNEP 2017c
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Dittrich et al. project that a business-as-usual scenario will raise material use from 68 billion tons in 2008 to 180 billion tons in 2050.
“Dittrich et al (2012) show that a 'business as usual' scenario will result in material use rising from 68 billion tons in 2008 to 180 billion tons in 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dittrich et al 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Schandl et al.'s reference scenario projects global resource use growing from 79.4 billion tonnes in 2010 to 183 billion tons in 2050, with slight relative decoupling.
“The reference scenario, with no significant change to environmental policies, shows that global resource use grows from 79.4 billion tonnes in 2010 to 183 billion tons in 2050 (similar to the Dittrich et al projection), with slight relative decoupling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schandl et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Schandl et al.'s medium efficiency scenario projects resource use growing at about half the rate of GDP, reaching 130 billion tons by 2050.
“The 'medium efficiency' scenario, with a carbon price of $25 per ton of CO2 (rising by 4 per cent per year), shows that global resource use still grows steadily over the period, but at about half the rate of global GDP, reaching 130 billion tons by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schandl et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
UNEP's projections are significantly worse than Dittrich et al. or Schandl et al. predict.
“The UNEP projections are significantly worse than either Dittrich et al or Schandl et al predict.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites UNEP 2017c
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dittrich et al 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schandl et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Schandl et al.'s high efficiency scenario projects resource use growing at about one-fourth the rate of GDP, reaching 95 billion tons by 2050.
“The 'high efficiency' scenario, with a carbon price starting at $50 (rising by 4 per cent per year to $236 by 2050) plus a doubling in the material efficiency of the economy (from historical average improvements of 1.5 per cent per year up to 4.5 per cent per year), shows that global resource use still grows steadily, but at about one-fourth the rate of global GDP, reaching 95 billion tons in 2050”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schandl et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Absolute decoupling from resource use is not feasible on a global scale even under best-case policy conditions.
“(b) is not feasible on a global scale, even under best-case scenario policy conditions;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Hatfield-Dodds et al.'s model suggests this can be accomplished without outsourcing environmental impact to other countries.
“The model suggests that this can be accomplished without outsourcing environmental impact to other countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hatfield-Dodds et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Hatfield-Dodds et al.'s optimistic scenario shows material use declining from 2015 to 2040 but increasing again thereafter.
“The optimistic scenario in the Hatfield-Dodds et al model shows that material use declines from 2015 to 2040, but begins to increase again thereafter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hatfield-Dodds et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Ward et al. conclude that decoupling of GDP growth from resource use, whether relative or absolute, is at best temporary.
“Ward et al conclude that 'decoupling of GDP growth from resource use, whether relative or absolute, is at best only temporary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ward et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Ward et al. conclude that permanent decoupling is impossible for essential, non-substitutable resources because efficiency gains are governed by physical limits.
“Permanent decoupling (absolute or relative) is impossible for essential, non-substitutable resources because the efficiency gains are ultimately governed by physical limits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ward et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In Ward et al.'s longer term, material extraction rises by 2.16% per year, nearly matching GDP growth.
“While absolute decoupling from material extraction is achieved in the short term, in the longer term material extraction rises by 2.16 per cent per year, nearly matching the rate of GDP growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ward et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Overall, global carbon productivity has been slowing.
“Overall, global carbon productivity has been slowing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Emissions from the global South have continued upward, albeit at a slower rate than GDP, i.e., relative decoupling.
“However, emissions from the global South have continued upward, albeit at a slower rate than GDP (i.e., relative decoupling).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A number of high-income countries have seen declining emissions in the 21st century despite continued economic growth.
“A number of high-income countries have seen declining emissions in the 21 st century, despite continued economic growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
All of these scenarios are green growth scenarios in that they stabilize global temperatures while global GDP continues to rise.
“All of these scenarios are green growth scenarios in that they stabilise global temperatures while global GDP continues to rise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IPCC AR5
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
BECCS is highly controversial among climate scientists.
“BECCS is highly controversial among climate scientists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
IPCC modeling teams began including BECCS in their scenarios from 2005 despite having no firm evidence of its feasibility.
“IPCC modeling teams began including it in their scenarios from 2005, despite having no firm evidence of its feasibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Business-as-usual is set to lead to 4.2 degrees of warming (2.5 to 5.5 degrees) by 2100.
“Business-as-usual is set to lead to 4.2 degrees of warming (2.5 degrees to 5.5 degrees) by 2100.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Rising GDP is a built-in feature of the Shared Socio-Economic Pathways that form the basis for the IPCC mitigation scenarios.
“Rising GDP is a built-in feature of the Shared Socio-Economic Pathways (SSPs), which form the basis for the IPCC mitigation scenarios (Kuhnhenn 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kuhnhenn 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The vast majority of 2C scenarios (101 of 116) rely on BECCS to the point of achieving negative emissions.
“Indeed, the vast majority scenarios for 2C (101 of the 116) rely on BECCS to the point of achieving negative emissions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IPCC AR5
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
With the publication of AR5, BECCS was enshrined as a dominant assumption.
“With the publication of AR5, BECCS was enshrined as a dominant assumption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IPCC AR5
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The IRENA model relies on negative emissions technology to cover most of the remainder.
“The model relies on negative emissions technology to cover most of the remainder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IRENA 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Only 6 of the 116 scenarios for 2C in AR5 exclude BECCS.
“Only 6 of the 116 scenarios for 2C in AR5 exclude BECCS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IPCC AR5
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Schandl et al.'s high-efficiency scenario, without BECCS, shows that with global growth of 3% per year, annual emissions plateau to 2050 but do not decline.
“Even so, the result shows that with global growth of 3 per cent per year, annual emissions plateau to 2050 but do not decline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schandl et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
If global GDP grows at 2.1% per year, decoupling must occur at 6.4% per year for 2C.
“or 6.4 per cent per year for 2C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
If global GDP grows at 3% per year, decoupling must occur at 10.5% per year for 1.5C.
“If we assume global GDP continues to grow at 3 per cent per year (the average from 2010-2014), then decoupling must occur at a rate of 10.5 per cent per year for 1.5C”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
IRENA 2018 modelled a scenario for continued GDP growth compatible with 2C by relying on a rapid shift to renewable energy.
“The International Renewable Energy Association (IRENA 2018) have modelled a scenario for continued GDP growth compatible with 2C by relying on a rapid shift to renewable energy (consistent with Jacobson and Delucchi 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites IRENA 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jacobson and Delucchi 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
If global GDP grows at 3% per year, decoupling must occur at 7.3% per year for 2C.
“or 7.3 per cent per year for 2C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Results of empirical studies are not promising.
“Results of empirical studies are not promising.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
If global GDP grows at 2.1% per year, decoupling must occur at 9.6% per year for 1.5C.
“If global GDP grows at 2.1 per cent per year (as PWC predicts), then decoupling must occur at 9.6 per cent per year for 1.5C”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
A growth rate of 0% requires decarbonization of 6.8% per year for 1.5C.
“A growth rate of 0 per cent requires decarbonization of 6.8 per cent per year (for 1.5C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
A growth rate of 0% requires decarbonization of 4% per year for 2C.
“and 4 per cent per year (for 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
If Annex 1 nations need 12% emissions reductions per year and GDP growth continues at 1.86% per year, decoupling must occur at 15.8% per year.
“If we accept that Annex 1 nations need to achieve emissions reductions of 12 per cent per year, and if we assume that GDP growth in Annex 1 nations continues at 1.86 per cent per year (the average from 2010-2014), then decoupling must occur at a rate of 15.8 per cent per year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Empirical projections show no absolute decoupling at a global scale, even under highly optimistic conditions.
“Empirical projections show no absolute decoupling at a global scale, even under highly optimistic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Van der Voet et al. found a high aggregate correlation of 0.73 between material throughput and ecological impacts.
“Van der Voet et al (2004, 2005) find that while the mass flows of individual materials are not indicative of their ecological impacts, and while impacts vary as technologies change, at an aggregate level there is a high degree of correlation (0.73) between material throughput and ecological impacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van der Voet et al 2004, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Empirical evidence on resource use and carbon emissions does not support green growth theory.
“But empirical evidence on resource use and carbon emissions does not support green growth theory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
DMC is problematic because it excludes the material impact involved in producing and transporting imported goods.
“DMC is a problematic indicator, however, as it does not include the material impact involved in the production and transport of imported goods (Wiedmann et al. 2015, Gutowski et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wiedmann et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gutowski et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Absolute decoupling from carbon emissions is highly unlikely to be achieved at a rate rapid enough to prevent global warming over 1.5C or 2C, even under optimistic policy conditions.
“absolute decoupling from carbon emissions is highly unlikely to be achieved at a rate rapid enough to prevent global warming over 1.5C or 2C, even under optimistic policy conditions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is no historical evidence that switching to services will by itself reduce global material throughput.
“Whatever the cause may be, there is no historical evidence that switching to services will, in and of itself, reduce the material throughput of the global economy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The rebound effect cancels out some resource efficiency gains because lower costs free income and increase effective demand.
“The rebound effect cancels out some gains in resource efficiency.This happens because such gains reduce the cost of a good or service, freeing up income and increasing effective demand (see Herring and Sorrell 2009 for a review of the literature).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Herring and Sorrell 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
These models suggest absolute decoupling is not feasible on a global scale with continued economic growth.
“These models suggest that absolute decoupling is not feasible on a global scale in the context of continued economic growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Absolute decoupling from resource use is physically impossible to maintain in the longer term.
“and (c) is physically impossible to maintain in the longer term.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The literature is clear that material footprint needs to be scaled down significantly from present levels.
“Still, the literature is clear that material footprint needs to be scaled down significantly from present levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Existing trends are incompatible with the Paris Agreement targets.
“Existing trends are incompatible with the Paris Agreement targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Green growth theory in terms of resource use lacks empirical support.
“In light of this data, we can conclude that green growth theoryin terms of resource uselacks empirical support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
To be truly green, green growth requires absolute decoupling rapid enough to meet ecological targets, not just any degree of absolute decoupling.
“In other words, to be truly green, green growth requires not just any degree of absolute decoupling, but absolute decoupling that is rapid enough to meet ecological targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
An emerging consensus holds that global material footprint needs to be reduced to 50 billion tons per year to be compatible with the planet's ecology.
“An emerging consensus holds that global material footprint needs to be reduced to 50 billion tons per year in order to be compatible with the planet's ecology (Dittrich et al. 2012, Hoekstra & Wiedmann 2014, UNEP IRP 2014, Bringezu 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dittrich et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hoekstra & Wiedmann 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites UNEP IRP 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Green growth could be accomplished at very low GDP growth rates below 1% per year, significantly lower than historical and projected pathways.
“It is reasonable to expect that green growth could be accomplished at very low GDP growth rates, i.e., less than 1 per cent per yearsignificantly lower than historical trends and projected pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The conclusion that green growth lacks support on resource use is sensitive to baseline GDP growth; as growth approaches zero, absolute decoupling becomes more feasible and likely lasts longer.
“First, this conclusion is sensitive to the baseline rate of GDP growth.The studies cited above project growth at 2-3 per cent per year.As the growth rate approaches zero, absolute decoupling becomes more feasible, and is likely to last longer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Once these shifts were complete, continued economic growth drove emissions up again.
“Once these shifts were complete, continued economic growth drove emissions up again.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Because all materials have some impact, indefinite growth of any material category is not compatible with ecological principles.
“And because all materials have some impact, indefinite growth of any material category is not compatible with ecological principles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: All materials have some ecological impact, so indefinite growth in any material category is incompatible with ecological principles.
- Premisereasoning
For climate change, the objective is to keep total emissions within carbon budgets, not merely reduce emissions flows.
“When it comes to climate change, however, the objective is not simply to reduce emissions (a matter of flows), but to keep total emissions from exceeding specific carbon budgets (a matter of stocks).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
To keep warming below 1.5C or 2C, the world will have to make much more aggressive emissions reductions.
“In order to keep warming below these thresholds, the world will have to make much more aggressive emissions reductions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is not clear that we can justifiably rely on BECCS, an unproven technology, to underwrite green growth theory.
“It is not clear that we can justifiably rely on BECCS, an unproven technology, to underwrite green growth theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Relying on negative emissions technologies allows for a much larger carbon budget (about double the actual size) by assuming successful reduction of global atmospheric carbon in the second half of the century.
“Relying on these 'negative emissions technologies' allows for a much larger carbon budget (about double the actual size) by assuming that we can successfully reduce global atmospheric carbon in the second half of the century.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The C-ROADS tool projects decoupling of at most 4% per year under the most aggressive abatement policies.
“The C-ROADS tool (developed by Climate Interactive and MIT Sloan) projects decoupling of at most 4 per cent per year under the most aggressive possible abatement policies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C-ROADS tool
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The IPCC (2000) global best-case scenario projects decoupling of 3.3% per year without BECCS.
“The IPCC's (2000) global best-case-scenario projects decoupling of 3.3 per cent per year without BECCS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IPCC's (2000)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
These required decoupling rates are beyond what existing empirical models indicate is feasible.
“All of these targets are beyond what existing empirical models indicate is feasible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Schandl et al. model indicates decoupling can happen by at most 3% per year under optimistic conditions.
“The Schandl et al model indicates that decoupling can happen by at most 3 per cent per year under optimistic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schandl et al
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Van Vuuren et al. (2018) found that even with highly optimistic assumptions, continued GDP growth drives emissions to exceed the carbon budgets for 1.5C and 2C without negative emissions technologies.
“Even with these highly optimistic assumptions in place, they find that the pressures of continued growth drive emissions to exceed the carbon budgets for 1.5C and 2C, without negative emissions technologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Vuuren et al (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
This is feasible inasmuch as the transition to wind and solar itself improves energy efficiency.
“This is feasible inasmuch as the transition to wind and solar itself improves energy efficiency (Jacobson and Delucchi 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jacobson and Delucchi 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
All studies cited above project global GDP growth at 2-3% per year.
“All of the studies cited above project global GDP growth at 2-3 per cent per year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The empirical basis for the LED scenario's GDP trend is not robust.
“However, the empirical basis for this GDP trend is not robust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Anderson (2018) estimates that as the remaining carbon budget is smaller, Annex 1 nations need to reduce emissions by 12% per year.
“Anderson (2018) estimates that Annex 1 nations need to reduce emissions by 12 per cent per year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anderson (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Without negative emissions technologies, the rates of decarbonization required for 1.5C or 2C are significantly steeper than extant models suggest is feasible even with aggressive mitigation policies.
“Without these technologies, the rates of decarbonization required for 1.5C or 2C are significantly steeper than extant models suggest is feasible even with aggressive mitigation policies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A lower rate of growth requires a lower rate of decarbonization.
“A lower rate of growth requires a lower rate of decarbonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The MESSAGE-Globium model calculates GDP from only two inputs: labour supply and energy.
“It is derived from the MESSAGE-Globium model, which calculates GDP from only two inputs: labour supply (population size and productivity) and energy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites MESSAGE-Globium model
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Holz et al. (2018) find that without widespread negative emissions technologies, the required decarbonization rate for the Paris Agreement is well outside what is currently deemed achievable based on historical evidence and standard modelling.
“Holz et al (2018) find that if we rule out widespread use of negative emissions technologies, the required rate of decarbonization for meeting the Paris Agreement is 'well outside what is currently deemed achievable, based on historical evidence and standard modelling.'”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holz et al (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the LED scenario, with efficiency improvements, industrial energy demand declines by 57% in the North and 23% in the South.
“With efficiency improvements, this translates into industrial energy demand declining by 57 per cent in the North and 23 per cent in the South.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grubler et al (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Models that project green growth within the Paris Agreement rely heavily on negative emissions technologies that are either unproven or dangerous at scale.
“Models that do project green growth within the constraints of the Paris Agreement rely heavily on negative emissions technologies that are either unproven or dangerous at scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Grubler et al. (2018) LED scenario accomplishes emissions reductions compatible with 1.5C by reducing global energy demand by 40% by 2050.
“The scenario, known as 'Low Energy Demand' (LED), accomplishes emissions reductions compatible with 1.5C by reducing global energy demand by 40 per cent by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grubler et al (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
The rate of decoupling in Annex 1 nations has generally slowed over 1970-2013.
“it is important to bear in mind that the rate of decoupling has generally slowed over this period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Anderson and Bows (2011) modeled that for a 50% chance of staying under 2C without BECCS, Annex 1 nations need to reduce emissions by 8-10% per year beginning in 2015.
“To stay within the remaining carbon budget, Annex 1 nations need to reduce emissions by 8-10 per cent per year, beginning in 2015.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anderson and Bows (2011)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The required 15.8% decoupling exceeds the decoupling rate implied by average G20 NDCs (3% per year) by a factor of five.
“It also exceeds the decoupling rate implied by the average G20 Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement (viz., 3 per cent per year) by a factor of five.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is unlikely that absolute decoupling will happen fast enough to respect the carbon budgets for 1.5C and 2C against continued economic growth.
“it is unlikely to happen fast enough to respect the carbon budgets for 1.5C and 2C against a background of continued economic growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The historic rate of decoupling in Annex 1 nations was 1.9% per year from 1970 to 2013.
“this is eight times faster than the historic rate of decoupling in Annex 1 nations (viz., 1.9 per cent per year from 1970 to 2013)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
All these results fall short of the decoupling rate required if the global economy continues to grow at expected rates.
“All of these results fall short of the decoupling rate that must be achieved if the global economy continues to grow at expected rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is no reason why the economy cannot in theory grow using progressively less energy and resources.
“there is no reason why the economy cannot in theory grow using progressively less energy and resources”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Any absolute reductions due to substitution or efficiency will at best be temporary.
“Any absolute reductions due to substitution or efficiency will at best be temporary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Given compound growth, resource use and impact will tend to infinity.
“Given that compound growth quickly turns to infinity, so too will resource use and impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Emissions reductions in line with 1.5C are not empirically feasible except in a de-growth scenario.
“emissions reductions in line with 1.5C are not empirically feasible except in a de-growth scenario.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Schroder and Storm (2018) find that reducing emissions in line with the 2C target is feasible under optimistic assumptions only if global economic growth is less than 0.45% per year.
“Schroder and Storm (2018), which finds that reducing emissions in line with the 2C target is feasible (under optimistic assumptions) only if global economic growth is less than 0.45 per cent per year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schroder and Storm (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A 4% decarbonization rate is nearly within reach.
“but 4 per cent is nearly within reach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
There is no empirical evidence that 6.8% decarbonization can be achieved on a global scale.
“There is no empirical evidence that 6.8 per cent can be achieved on a global scale”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Indefinite growth will sooner or later lead to an increase in resource and energy use.
“indefinite growth will sooner or later lead to increase in resource and energy use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The IPAT model gives the impression that affluence and technology are independent factors, when in fact they affect one another.
“It is worth noting that the IPAT model gives the impression that A and T, or scale and efficiency, are independent factors, when in fact they affect one another (Ekins 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ekins 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Green growth is not empirically actual.
“Green growth, we have shown, is not empirically actual”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is empirically feasible to achieve green growth within a carbon budget for 2C with the most aggressive possible mitigation policies if the growth rate is very close to zero and mitigation starts immediately.
“it is empirically feasible to achieve green growth within a carbon budget for 2C with the most aggressive possible mitigation policies if the growth rate is very close to zero and if mitigation starts immediately.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There is a thermodynamically defined maximum of efficiency.
“As there is a thermodynamically defined maximum of efficiency”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ward et al's (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
This refers to a fundamental macro-mechanism through which industrial economies grow by using resources more productively.
“it refers to a more fundamental macro-mechanism through which industrial economies grow by using resources more productively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Absolute decoupling should theoretically be possible.
“One may conclude then that absolute decoupling should theoretically be possible”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Population, affluence and technology are not independent from one another.
“Furthermore, P, A and T are not independent from one another.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In a hypothetical economy powered by the sun with recycling, after the transition, any further growth leads to growth in resource use.
“after the transition takes place then any further growth in this economy will lead to a growth in resource use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is no a priori reason why efficiency cannot increase faster than scale, or as fast as necessary to reduce impact to a sustainable level.
“there is no a priori reason why it cannot increase faster than scale, or even as fast as necessary to reduce impact to a sustainable level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
More relative decoupling does not necessarily amount to absolute decoupling.
“And it does not follow that more and more relative decoupling will amount to absolute decoupling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
If values are incommensurable, it is impossible to aggregate them and determine whether total value is growing.
“if values are incommensurable, it is impossible to aggregate them and determine whether total value is growing or not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This review finds that extant empirical evidence does not support the theory of green growth.
“This review finds that extant empirical evidence does not support the theory of green growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is more plausible that we will be able to achieve the necessary reductions in resource use and emissions without growth than with growth.
“It is more plausible that we will be able to achieve the necessary reductions in resource use and emissions without growth than with growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It cannot be proven that green growth is theoretically impossible, as long as ultimate limits in efficiency and substitution have not been reached.
“it cannot be proven either that green growth is theoretically impossible, at least not as long as ultimate limits in efficiency and substitution have not been reached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
No one has ever independently measured utility to test whether it correlates with prices or willingness to pay.
“Indeed, no one has ever independently measured utility to test whether it correlates with prices or willingness to pay (Sagoff 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sagoff 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Green growth requires permanent absolute decoupling of resource use from GDP.
“Green growth requires that we achieve permanent absolute decoupling of resource use from GDP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
We do not have a theory of value that allows us to determine whether value can be absolutely decoupled from throughput.
“We therefore do not have a theory of value that allows us to determine whether value can be absolutely decoupled from throughput.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It cannot be proven that green growth of value is theoretically possible, unless we accept a framework that makes it by definition possible.
“it cannot be proven that green growth of value is theoretically possible, unless we accept a framework that makes it by definition possible”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Existing empirical studies demonstrate that green growth is at best highly unlikely.
“existing empirical studies demonstrate that green growth is at best highly unlikely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The evidence presented above indicates that in order for efficiency gains to be effective, we will need to scale down aggregate economic activity too.
“The evidence presented above indicates that in order for efficiency gains to be effective, we will need to scale down aggregate economic activity too.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 73
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 35
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationNon-energy material consumption in the OECD declined from 12 tonnes per capita in 2000 to 10 tonnes per capita in 2015, with the downward trend beginning after the 2008 financial crisis.
“Non-energy material consumption in the OECD declined from 12 tonnes per capita in 2000 to 10 tonnes per capita in 2015, with the downward trend beginning after the financial crisis in 2008”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe OECD concluded that material productivity has been improving in some OECD countries.
“In the 2017 edition of Green Growth Indicators, the OECD concluded that 'material productivity has been improving in some OECD countries' (45).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWiedmann et al. show that the USA, UK, Japan, OECD, and EU-27 achieved relative decoupling of GDP from DMC including fossil fuels, but their material footprint rose at a rate equal to or greater than GDP, indicating no decoupling or re-coupling.
“Wiedmann et al show that while the USA, UK, Japan, the OECD and EU-27 have achieved relative decoupling of GDP from DMC (including fossil fuels), material footprint has been rising at a rate equal to or greater than GDP, suggesting no decoupling at all; indeed, in most cases re-coupling has occurred”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wiedmann et al 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationKrausmann et al. show global extraction and consumption of materials increased 8-fold from 1900 to 2005, reaching 59 billion tons per year, growing at annual rates between 1% and 4%.
“Krausmann et al (2009) show that global extraction and consumption of materials (including fossil fuels) increased 8-fold during the period 1900 to 2005, reaching 59 billion tons per year, growing at annual rates between 1 per cent and 4 per cent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Krausmann et al 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe world economy is on a path of re-materialization and far from even relative decoupling.
“Currently, the world economy is therefore on a path of re-materialization and far away from anyeven relativedecoupling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Materialflows.net 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSouth Africa had near-zero growth in material footprint since 1990, but no evidence of sustained absolute decoupling.
“South Africa is the most notable of the three, with near-zero growth in material footprint since 1990, although no evidence of sustained absolute decoupling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wiedmann et al 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMaterialflows.net shows modest growth of global material footprint from 1980 to 2002 at 1.78% per year, slower than GDP, achieving some relative decoupling.
“Materialflows.net (2015) shows a period of modest growth of global material footprint from 1980 to 2002, at 1.78 per cent per year.As this was slower than the rate of GDP growth, some relative decoupling was achieved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Materialflows.net 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFrom 2002 to 2013, global material use accelerated at 3.85% per year, rising faster than GDP, so material intensity increased.
“However, the final decade from 2002 to 2013 shows an acceleration of global material use, at 3.85 per cent per year.3 Global material use rose more quickly than GDP during this decade.In other words, the material intensity of the world economy has been increasing in the 21 st century, not decreasing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Materialflows.net 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationGiljum et al. found global consumption grew 93.4% between 1980 and 2009, averaging 2.4% per year, reaching 67.6 billion tonnes.
“Giljum et al. (2014) find that global consumption grew by 93.4 per cent between 1980 and 2009, at an average rate of 2.4 per cent per year, to reach a total of 67.6 billion tonnes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giljum et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMaterialflows.net data show global material footprint grew 132% from 1980 to 2013, averaging 2.5% per year, reaching nearly 85 billion tons.
“Materialflows.net (2015), which is run by the Vienna University of Economics and Business, offers data for the period 1980 to 2013 and shows that global material footprint grew 132 per cent, at an average rate of 2.5 per cent per year, to reach nearly 85 billion tons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Materialflows.net 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationGiljum et al. found global consumption growth accelerated in the 21st century, averaging 3.4% per year between 2000 and 2009, with no decoupling.
“Giljum et al (2014) also find that the growth rate of global consumption accelerated in the 21 st century, averaging 3.4 per cent per year between 2000 and 2009; once again, no decoupling was achieved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giljum et al 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationGlobal historical trends show relative decoupling but no evidence of absolute decoupling, and 21st century trends show worse efficiency and re-coupling.
“In sum: global historical trends show relative decoupling but no evidence of absolute decoupling, and 21 st century trends show not greater efficiency but rather worse efficiency, with recoupling occurring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn the 21st century, global consumption growth increased between 2000 and 2005, averaging 3.7% per year, matching GDP growth and achieving no decoupling.
“But this changed in the 21 st century: the growth rate of global consumption increased between 2000 and 2005, averaging 3.7 per cent per year.As this matched the growth rate of GDP, no decoupling was achieved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Krausmann et al 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationServices grew from 63% of world GDP in 1997 to 69% in 2015, while global material use accelerated and outstripped GDP growth.
“As a proportion of world GDP, services have grown from 63 per cent in 1997 to 69 per cent in 2015, according to World Bank data.Yet during this same period global material use has accelerated, outstripping global GDP growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Bank
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe Green Growth Indicators partly recognizes the indirect flows problem but provides no data on indirect flows, and available data suggests progress has been negative.
“The Green Growth Indicators partly recognises this problem, stating 'progress is moderate once indirect flows associated with trade are considered.'Yet the report does not provide any data on indirect flows; and the data that is available suggests that progress has been not moderate but negative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationEkins and Hughes say UNEP's worse projections are because they incorporated the rebound effect.
“The model's authors, Ekins and Hughes, say this because they have incorporated the 'rebound effect' into their model (UNEP 2017c, 106 ff.).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UNEP 2017c
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn high-income nations, services rose from 69% to 74% of GDP, but DMC did not diminish and material footprint outpaced GDP growth.
“Services represent 74 per cent of GDP in high-income nations (up from 69 per cent in 1997), but DMC has not diminished and material footprint is outpacing GDP growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Bank
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationEven with optimistic assumptions, Schandl et al. conclude that some relative decoupling can be achieved but none leads to absolute reduction in materials footprint.
“Yet even with this optimistic assumption, Schandl et al conclude: 'Our research shows that while some relative decoupling can be achieved in some scenarios, none would lead to an absolute reduction in… materials footprint.'”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schandl et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationUnder Dittrich et al.'s optimistic scenario, resource use reaches 93 billion tons by 2050, representing relative decoupling but no absolute reduction.
“Under this scenario, resource use reaches 93 billion tons by 2050.This represents relative decoupling, but no absolute reduction in material use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dittrich et al 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationDittrich et al. conclude that this level of resource use is not an option for the future.
“Dittrich et al conclude that this level of resource use is 'not an option for the future'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dittrich et al 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationUNEP's high efficiency scenario projects global resource use rising to 132 billion tons in 2050, with some relative decoupling but no absolute reduction.
“The high efficiency scenario projects that global resource use rises to 132 billion tons in 2050.While some relative decoupling is achieved, there is no absolute reduction in resource use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UNEP 2017c
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationUNEP states that productivity gains in today's linear production system likely lead to increased material demand through economic growth and rebound effects.
“Productivity gains in today's linear production system are likely to lead to increased material demand through a combination of economic growth and rebound effects' (12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UNEP 2017c
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationABARE reports that efficiency is likely to improve by only 0.2% to 0.5% per year, at most one-eighth of the rate Hatfield-Dodds et al. assume.
“Indeed, the Australian Bureau of Agricultural Economics (ABARE 2008) reports that efficiency is likely to improve by only 0.2 per cent to 0.5 per cent per year into the futureat most one-eighth of the rate that Hatfield-Dodds assume.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites ABARE 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationUNEP acknowledges that resource efficiency improvements alone are not enough for sustainability or green growth.
“In light of these findings, UNEP acknowledges that improvements in resource efficiency will not be enough, in and of themselves, to achieve sustainability, or green growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UNEP 2017c
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWard et al. find material extraction declines until 2050 at about 4% per year, then flattens and rises, so by 2100 material use is 20% to 60% higher than in 2015.
“They find that material extraction declines until 2050 (decoupling at an average rate of about 4 per cent per year) but then flattens off and rises steadily so that by 2100 material use is 20 per cent to 60 per cent higher than its initial value in 2015.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ward et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHatfield-Dodds et al. find that substantial economic and physical decoupling is possible, with GDP increasing at 2.41% per year while environmental pressures ease.
“They find that 'substantial economic and physical decoupling is possible,' with GDP increasing at an average rate of 2.41 per cent per year 'while associated environmental pressures ease (greenhouse gas emissions, water stress, native habitat loss)'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hatfield-Dodds et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe empirical data suggest absolute decoupling from resource use may be possible short term in some rich nations with strong abatement policy, but only assuming theoretical efficiency gains that may be impossible.
“The empirical data suggest that absolute decoupling from resource use (a) may be possible in the short term in some rich nations with strong abatement policy, but only assuming theoretical efficiency gains that may be impossible to achieve in reality;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationFrom 2000 to 2014 there was no improvement in carbon productivity, so not even relative decoupling was achieved in the 21st century.
“However, from 2000 to 2014 there was no improvement in carbon productivityin other words, not even relative decoupling has been achieved in the 21 st century.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Bank
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenGlobal emissions began to rise again in 2017 (1.6%) and 2018 (2.7%).
“until global emissions began to rise again in 2017 (1.6 per cent) and 2018 (2.7 per cent).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenChina's emissions declined slightly between 2014 and 2016, a brief period of absolute decoupling, before growing again in 2017.
“China's emissions declined slightly between 2014 and 2016 (a brief period of absolute decoupling), before growing again in 2017.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOn a global level, CO2 emissions have increased steadily, falling only during periods of economic recession.
“On a global level, CO2 emissions have increased steadily, falling only during periods of economic recession.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationWorld Bank data show carbon productivity improved steadily from 1960 to 2000, with decarbonization averaging 1.28% per year (relative decoupling).
“World Bank data shows that carbon productivity (CO2 per 2010 $US GDP) improved steadily from 1960 to 2000, with decarbonization at an average rate of 1.28 per cent per year (relative decoupling).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Bank
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFigure 4(a) shows declining emissions in the US and EU28 in both territorial and consumption-based terms from 2006 to 2016, i.e., absolute decoupling.
“Figure 4(a) above shows declining emissions in the US and EU28, in both territorial and consumption-based terms, from 2006 to 2016 (i.e., absolute decoupling).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAnalysts attribute the temporary plateau to a shift in China away from coal and mostly toward oil and gas, and a shift in the US to natural gas.
“Analysts attribute the temporary plateau to a shift in China away from coal and (mostly) toward oil and gas, and a shift in the US to natural gas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenNo credible empirical models contradict the conclusion that green growth theory lacks support on resource use.
“We are not aware of any credible empirical models that contradict this conclusion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationGlobal emissions leveled off in 2015 and 2016 while GDP continued to rise, prompting the IEA to announce decoupling of global emissions and economic growth confirmed.
“Global emissions did level off in 2015 and 2016 while GDP continued to rise, prompting the International Energy Agency, a research arm of the OECD, to announce 'Decoupling of global emissions and economic growth confirmed' (IEA 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IEA 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHigh-income nations have done better in territorial emissions, but progress slowed from 1.91% per year from 1970 to 2000 to 1.61% per year from 2000 to 2014.
“High-income nations have done better, at least in terms of territorial emissions (the World Bank does not track consumption-based emissions), but even so progress has slowed, from an average rate of 1.91 per cent per year from 1970 to 2000, down to 1.61 per cent per year from 2000 to 2014.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Bank
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThere is a steady long-term trend toward relative decoupling of GDP from carbon emissions, and absolute reductions in carbon emissions are possible.
“Unlike with resource use, there is a steady long-term trend toward relative decoupling of GDP from carbon emissions, and we know that absolute reductions in carbon emissions are possible to achieve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEven with Nationally Determined Contributions and Intended Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement, global warming is projected to reach 3.3 degrees (1.9 to 4.4 degrees), still exceeding 1.5C and 2C.
“Even with the Nationally Determined Contributions and Intended Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement, global warming is still projected to reach 3.3 degrees (1.9 degrees to 4.4 degrees)an improvement over the BAU scenario but still far exceeding the 1.5C and 2C thresholds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationAnderson and Peters point out that the allure of BECCS is that it allows politicians to postpone rapid emissions reductions.
“Anderson and Peters (2016) point out that the 'allure' of BECCS is due to the fact that it allows politicians to postpone the need for rapid emissions reductions: 'BECCS licenses the ongoing combustion of fossil fuels while ostensibly fulfilling the Paris Commitments.'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anderson and Peters 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe scale of biomass assumed in AR5 scenarios would require plantations covering land two to three times the size of India, raising questions about land availability, food competition, carbon neutrality, and biodiversity loss.
“Second, the scale of biomass assumed in the AR5 scenarios would require plantations covering land two to three times the size of India, which raises questions about land availability, competition with food production, carbon neutrality, and biodiversity loss (Smith et al 2015”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationKeith noted that while measured use of biomass could help mitigate environmental problems, large-scale use of cropped biomass will not.
“In Keith's (2001) initial formulation of the idea, he noted that while 'measured use' of biomass could help mitigate environmental problems, 'large scale use of cropped biomass will not.'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keith 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report includes 116 mitigation scenarios consistent with RCP2.6, which offers the best chances of staying below 2C.
“The IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) includes 116 mitigation scenarios that are consistent with Representative Concentration Pathway 2.6 (RCP2.6),which offers the best chances of staying below 2C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IPCC AR5
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWithout BECCS, global emissions need to fall to net zero by 2050 for 1.5C, or by 2075 for 2C.
“Without BECCS, global emissions need to fall to net zero by 2050 for 1.5C, or by 2075 for 2C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe viability of power generation with CCS has never been proven economically viable or scalable; it would require construction of 15,000 facilities.
“First, the viability of power generation with CCS has never been proven to be economically viable or scalable; it would require the construction of 15,000 facilities (Peters 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationObersteiner considers BECCS a risk-management strategy or backstop technology and says the IPCC has misused it by including it in regular scenarios to take pressure off conventional mitigation.
“he considers BECCS to be what he calls a 'riskmanagement strategy', or a 'backstop technology' in case climate feedback loops turn out to be worse than expected, and says the IPCC has 'misused' it by including it in regular scenarios to take pressure off of conventional mitigation pathways (i.e., emissions reductions) (Hickman 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hickman 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThis entails reductions of 6.8% per year and 4% per year, respectively.
“This entails reductions of 6.8 per cent per year and 4 per cent per year, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationAR5 warns that these scenarios typically involve temporary overshoot of atmospheric concentrations and typically rely on widespread deployment of BECCS.
“AR5 warns, however, that these scenarios 'typically involve temporary overshoot of atmospheric concentrations' and 'typically rely on the availability and widespread deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)' (2014:23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IPCC AR5
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe IRENA scenario requires adding 12,200 GW of solar and wind capacity by 2050, with installation rates 2.3 to 4.6 times faster than present.
“The scenario requires adding 12,200 GW of solar and wind capacity by 2050, with a dramatic increase in installation rates (2.3 to 4.6 times faster than the present).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IRENA 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationEven this optimistic scenario accomplishes only 90% of the necessary emissions reductions for 2C, likely because it pays no attention to emissions from land use change and cement production.
“Still, even this optimistic scenario accomplishes only 90 per cent of the necessary emissions reductions for 2C (likely because it pays no attention to emissions from land use change and cement production).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IRENA 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe IRENA scenario requires the energy intensity of the global economy to fall by two-thirds, at 2.8% per year, double the historical rate, lowering energy demand in 2050 to slightly less than 2015 levels.
“The scenario also requires that the energy intensity of the global economy falls by two-thirds (by 2.8 per cent per year, double the historical rate), lowering energy demand in 2050 to slightly less than 2015 levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IRENA 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn this scenario, growth in energy demand outstrips the rate of decarbonization, violating the carbon budgets for 1.5C and 2C.
“In this scenario, growth in energy demand outstrips the rate of decarbonization, violating the carbon budgets for 1.5C and 2C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schandl et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThese 6 scenarios work by assuming optimal full technology in all other areas, mass afforestation, and high mitigation costs.
“These work by assuming 'optimal full technology' in all other areas, plus mass afforestation, and with high mitigation costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IPCC AR5
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThese represent theoretically possible pathways, but without any empirical evidence as to their feasibility.
“These represent theoretically possible pathways, but without any empirical evidence as to their feasibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAbsolute decoupling of GDP from emissions is possible and already happening in some regions.
“while absolute decoupling of GDP from emissions is possible and is already happening in some regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDMC is a well-established and widely used proxy for ecological pressure with robust empirical grounding.
“While DMC is not a direct indicator of ecological pressure, it is a well-established and widely-used proxy in the policy literature and enjoys robust empirical grounding for this purpose (Krausmann et al. 2009, p. 2703).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Krausmann et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationUNEP defines green growth as requiring absolute decoupling of GDP from resource use and environmental impact.
“UNEP offers the clearestand strongestpolicy-oriented definition of green growth, namely, that green growth requires absolute decoupling of GDP from resource use and environmental impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UNEP 2011b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe OECD's DMC measure excludes fossil fuels, which is not normal practice in the material flows literature.
“it should be noted, however, that the OECD's version of DMC does not include fossil fuels; this is not normal practice in the literature on material flows”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGreen growth theory is now assumed in national and international policy, including the Sustainable Development Goals.
“This claim is now assumed in national and international policy, including in the Sustainable Development Goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGreen growth theory rests on the assumption that absolute decoupling of GDP growth from resource use and carbon emissions is feasible at a rate sufficient to prevent dangerous climate change and ecological breakdown.
“It rests on the assumption that absolute decoupling of GDP growth from resource use and carbon emissions is feasible (e.g., Solow 1973), and at a rate sufficient to prevent dangerous climate change and other dimensions of ecological breakdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Solow 1973
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGreen growth theory holds that continued GDP expansion can be compatible with ecology because technological change and substitution will absolutely decouple GDP growth from resource use and carbon emissions.
“Green growth theory asserts that continued economic expansion is compatible with our planet's ecology, as technological change and substitution will allow us to absolutely decouple GDP growth from resource use and carbon emissions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe OECD, UNEP, and World Bank agree that technological change and substitution will improve the ecological efficiency of the economy and that governments can accelerate this with regulations and incentives.
“The three institutions agree however on the mechanism for achieving green growth.The promise is that technological change and substitution will improve the ecological efficiency of the economy, and that governments can speed this process with the right regulations and incentives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe 4.5% annual material efficiency improvement assumed by Schandl et al. has no empirical basis and no evidence of being sustainable.
“It is important to note that the rate of material efficiency improvements that Schandl et al assume (viz., 4.5 per cent per year) has no empirical basis.They provide no evidence that such a rapid rate is possible to sustain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schandl et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWard et al. conclude that GDP growth ultimately cannot plausibly be decoupled from growth in material and energy use, so GDP growth cannot be sustained indefinitely.
“Growth in GDP ultimately cannot plausibly be decoupled from growth in material and energy use, demonstrating categorically that GDP growth cannot be sustained indefinitely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ward et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationWard et al. argue that the resurgence in material extraction occurs because resource efficiency cannot improve forever and eventually approaches physical limits.
“Ward et al (2016) argue that this resurgence in material extraction happens because resource efficiency cannot improve forever, as eventually it approaches physical limits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ward et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationHatfield-Dodds et al. provide no evidence for their assumption that a 70% drop in material intensity is possible; Alexander et al. call this rate baseless and unrealistic.
“First, they provide no evidence for their assumption that a 70 per cent drop in material intensity is possible.Alexander et al (2018) have pointed out that this rate of efficiency improvement is baseless and unrealistic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alexander et al 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe aggregate material footprint indicator is regarded as a useful proxy because all constituent material categories exhibit roughly the same trends as the total, all increasing with GDP growth.
“but the aggregate measure is nonetheless regarded as a useful proxy because all of the constituent material categories exhibit roughly the same trends as the total (i.e., they all increase with GDP growth).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The aggregate material footprint indicator is a useful proxy because all constituent material categories exhibit roughly the same trends as the total, all increasing with GDP growth.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
PremisereasoningFor green growth, the question is whether emissions can be reduced fast enough to stay within carbon budgets for 1.5C or 2C while continuing economic growth.
“For green growth theory, then, the question is not only whether we can achieve absolute decoupling and reduce emissions, but whether we can reduce emissions fast enough to stay within the carbon budgets for 1.5C or 2C, as per the Paris Agreement, while still continuing economic growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe studies cited are based on the existing relationship between GDP and material throughput and model known variables.
“Second, the studies cited above are based on the existing relationship between GDP and material throughput.They model the impact of known variables, such as efficiency improvements, technological innovation, taxes, shifts to services, etc.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationBringezu suggests this reduction needs to happen by 2050.
“Bringezu (2015) goes further and suggests that this reduction needs to happen by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bringezu 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTheoretically, this can be accomplished with a rapid shift to 100% renewable energy, afforestation and soil regeneration, and alternative industrial processes.
“Theoretically, this can be accomplished with (a) a rapid shift to 100 per cent renewable energy to eliminate emissions from fossil fuel combustion (Jacobson and Delucchi 2011); plus (b) afforestation and soil regeneration to eliminate emissions from land use change; plus (c) a shift to alternative industrial processes to eliminate emissions from the production of cement, steel, and plastic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jacobson and Delucchi 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGrowth increases energy demand, making the transition to renewable energy more difficult, and increases emissions from land use change and industrial processes.
“Growth increases energy demand, making the transition to renewable energy more difficult, and increases emissions from land use change and industrial processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe MESSAGE-Globium model is insensitive to changes in material throughput, so reductions in production and consumption do not affect output.
“As the model is insensitive to changes in material throughput, reductions in production and consumption do not affect output.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the LED scenario, industrial activity declines by 42% in the North and 12% in the South.
“Industrial activity declines by 42 per cent in the North and 12 per cent in the South.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grubler et al (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe LED scenario projects continued GDP growth at just over 2% per year.
“The LED scenario projects continued GDP growth at just over 2 per cent per year”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grubler et al (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe low energy demand in the LED scenario does not affect growth because it is offset by efficiency improvements.
“The low energy demand in the LED scenario does not affect growth because it is offset by efficiency improvements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the LED scenario, aggregate total material output decreases by close to 20% from today, one-third due to dematerialization and two-thirds due to material efficiency improvements.
“'The aggregate total material output decreases by close to 20 per cent from today, one-third due to dematerialization, and two-thirds due to improvements in material efficiency.'”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grubler et al (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTechnological development causes economic growth and growth in consumption.
“We know for example from basic growth economics that technological development (T) causes economic growth and growth in consumption (A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites basic growth economics
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe metabolism of a larger organism is more efficient than that of a smaller one, but this is because the larger organism is bigger.
“the metabolism of a larger organism, say an elephant, is more efficient than that of a smaller one, say a mouse, but this is because the elephant is bigger (Polimeni et al 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Polimeni et al 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIPAT is a tautology, true by definition, and should not be confused with a causal model.
“But note that IPAT is a tautology, true by definition of the quantities involved, and should not be confused with a causal model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationWhen technology improves labour productivity, it leads to more growth and more jobs as the relative cost of labour declines.
“when technology improves labour productivity, we expect that this will lead to more growth and more jobs as the relative cost of labour declines”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kallis 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWard et al. indicate that the limits of resource efficiency may be reached by 2050.
“although note that Ward et al indicate that the limits of resource efficiency may be reached by 2050”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ward et al
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt seems likely that the insistence on green growth is politically motivated.
“It seems likely that the insistence on green growth is politically motivated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGough (2017) notes that combatting climate change might require not only new clean and efficient energy technologies, but also a reduction and re-composition of consumption, with a shift from carbon-intensive to low or zero carbon sectors.
“As Gough (2017) notes, combatting climate change might require not only new clean and efficient energy technologies, but also a reduction and re-composition of consumption, with a shift from carbon-intensive to low or zero carbon sectors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gough (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOur only reliable guide to the green growth/decoupling question must be empirical.
“our only reliable guide to the green growth/decoupling question must be empirical.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNeither the neoclassical nor the labour or energy theories of value have been empirically proven; they cannot accurately predict the price at which goods trade.
“Neither the neo-classical nor the labour or energy theories of value have been empirically proven; in other words, they cannot accurately predict the price at which goods trade.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sagoff 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningGreen growth also requires permanent absolute decoupling of carbon emissions from GDP, and at a rate rapid enough to prevent exceeding the carbon budget for 1.5C or 2C.
“Green growth also requires that we achieve permanent absolute decoupling of carbon emissions from GDP, and at a rate rapid enough to prevent us from exceeding the carbon budget for 1.5C or 2C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile some models show absolute decoupling may be achieved in high-income nations under highly optimistic conditions, they indicate it is not possible to sustain this trajectory in the long term.
“While some models show that absolute decoupling may be achieved in high-income nations under highly optimistic conditions, they indicate that it is not possible to sustain this trajectory in the long term.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationStaying within planetary boundaries may require a de-growth of production and consumption in high-consuming nations, and a shift away from the narrow growth-focused development agenda in the global South.
“Staying within planetary boundaries may require a de-growth of production and consumption in high-consuming nations (Victor 2008, Jackson 2009, Alier 2009, Kallis 2011, Kallis et al. 2012), and a shift away from the narrow growth-focused development agenda in the global South.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Victor 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jackson 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kallis 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOne can imagine a society that values the natural environment above all; such a value could grow while throughput decreases, but calling it green growth stretches the meaning of the term beyond relevance.
“one can imagine a society that values above all the quality of the natural environment; such a value could of course grow while throughput decreases, but to call such a scenario 'green growth' is to stretch the meaning of the term beyond relevance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe green growth literature provides no theory of value.
“Unfortunately, the green growth literature provides no such theory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThere are no scientific grounds upon which we should not question growth, if our goal is to avoid dangerous climate change and ecological breakdown.
“there are no scientific grounds upon which we should not question growth, if our goal is to avoid dangerous climate change and ecological breakdown.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThere might exist a more fundamental mechanism linking the scale of an economy to its throughput.
“it shows that there might exist a more fundamental mechanism that links the scale of an economy to its throughput that is worth exploring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWackernagel and Rees (1998) put it, 'the politically acceptable is ecologically disastrous while the ecologically necessary is politically impossible'.
“as Wackernagel and Rees (1998) put it, 'the politically acceptable is ecologically disastrous while the ecologically necessary is politically impossible'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wackernagel and Rees (1998)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIt is impossible to calculate the total labour or energy that has gone into the production of a good, or the utility it provides.
“It is impossible to calculate the total labour or energy that has gone into the production of a good, or the utility it provides.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sagoff 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile absolute decoupling is possible at both national and global scales (and already achieved in some regions), and while it is technically possible to decouple in line with the carbon budget for 1.5C or 2C, empirical projections show this is unlikely to be achieved, even under highly optimistic conditions.
“While absolute decoupling is possible at both national and global scales (and indeed has already been achieved in some regions), and while it is technically possible to decouple in line with the carbon budget for 1.5C or 2C, empirical projections show that this is unlikely to be achieved, even under highly optimistic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
All materials have some ecological impact, so indefinite growth in any material category is incompatible with ecological principles.
“And because all materials have some impact, indefinite growth of any material category is not compatible with ecological principles.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The aggregate material footprint indicator is a useful proxy because all constituent material categories exhibit roughly the same trends as the total, all increasing with GDP growth.
“but the aggregate measure is nonetheless regarded as a useful proxy because all of the constituent material categories exhibit roughly the same trends as the total (i.e., they all increase with GDP growth).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The set of empirical models considered in the review is representative of all feasible pathways for decoupling.
“All of these targets are beyond what existing empirical models indicate is feasible.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The historical rate of decoupling is a relevant benchmark for assessing future feasibility.
“this is eight times faster than the historic rate of decoupling in Annex 1 nations (viz., 1.9 per cent per year from 1970 to 2013)”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rebound effects mean that any efficiency gains are always overcompensated by increased use in our current economic system.
“Rebound effects, also known as Jevon's paradox, mean that any efficiency gains are always overcompensated by increased use in our current economic system [161,250].”
From Sustainability in computing education: A systematic literature review (2024) · cites this paper as [161]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Description of IPAT does not match its stated equation
MinorThe stated IPAT equation includes population and describes total impact. The accompanying description instead uses impact per capita, omits the population factor, and multiplies GDP per capita by GDP per ton of carbon-quantities whose product is not tons of carbon per capita.
“the IPAT equation (Environmental Impact = Population * Affluence * Technology)”
“which says that the impact of an economy (e.g., tons of C per capita) is equal to the scale of the economy (GDP per capita) times its efficiency (e.g., GDP per tons of carbon).”
Printed decoupling formula does not produce the cited rate
MinorUsing the paper's stated formula with 1.86% GDP growth and a 12% emissions reduction gives about 2.1%, not the cited 15.8%. The cited rate therefore cannot have been calculated using that formula.
“Using the equation: Rate of necessary decoupling = GDP growth rate / (1 -Rate of necessary emissions reductions).”
“If we accept that Annex 1 nations need to achieve emissions reductions of 12 per cent per year, and if we assume that GDP growth in Annex 1 nations continues at 1.86 per cent per year (the average from 2010-2014), then decoupling must occur at a rate of 15.8 per cent per year.13”
Cites
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527 · see citing works
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901 · see citing works
Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03180-140232 · Cited by 7,187 · see citing works
Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the earth
Bazan, G. (1997) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g31710273 · Cited by 4,693 · see citing works
Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400253 · Cited by 4,220 · see citing works
Special report on emissions scenarios
Nakićenović, N., Alcamo, J. M., Davis, G. F., de Vries, B. J. M., Fenhann, J. V., Gaffin, S. R., Gregory, K., Griibler, A., Jung, T. Y., Kram, T., et al. (2000) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3,423 · see citing works
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., & Dirzo, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1704949114 · Cited by 2,663 · see citing works
A good life for all within planetary boundaries
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4 · Cited by 1,779 · see citing works
Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve
Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., & Wheeler, D. R. (2002) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330027157 · Cited by 1,770 · see citing works
The material footprint of nations
Wiedmann, T., Schandl, H., Manfred Lenzen, A., Moran, D. D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1220362110 · Cited by 1,612 · see citing works
Jacobson, M. Z., & Delucchi, M. A. (2010) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.040 · Cited by 1,570 · see citing works
Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions
Smith, P., Davis, S. J., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Minx, J., Gabrielle, B., Kato, E., Jackson, R. B., Cowie, A., Kriegler, E., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2870 · Cited by 1,440 · see citing works
The trouble with negative emissions
Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4567 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
Grubler, A., Wilson, C., Bento, N., Boza-Kiss, B., Krey, V., McCollum, D. L., Rao, N. D., Riahi, K., Rogelj, J., De Stercke, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 · Cited by 1,178 · see citing works
Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., & Heinz, M. (2015) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12244 · Cited by 1,168 · see citing works
Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century
Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K., Haberl, H., & Fischer‐Kowalski, M. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007 · Cited by 1,140 · see citing works
Fuss, S., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., Tavoni, M., Andrew, R. M., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Jones, C. D., Kraxner, F., Nakicenovic, N., et al. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2392 · Cited by 1,114 · see citing works
Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Summary for policymakers
Pachauri, R. K., & Meyer, L. (2014) · Cited by 1,086 · see citing works
Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint
Hoekstra, A. Y., & Wiedmann, T. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248365 · Cited by 1,040 · see citing works
Global energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050
Gielen, D. J., Gorini, R., Wagner, N., Leme, R., Gutierrez, L., Prakash, G., Asmelash, E., Janeiro, L., Gallina, G., Vale, G., et al. (2019) · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Kallis, G. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007 · Cited by 934 · see citing works
Self-citationAlternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies
van Vuuren, D. P., Stehfest, E., Gernaat, D., van den Berg, M., Bijl, D. L., de Boer, H. S., Daioglou, V., Doelman, J., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Harmsen, M. J. H. M., et al. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Inclusive green growth : the pathway to sustainable development
Fay, M., & Hallegatte, S. (2012) · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Kallis, G., Kerschner, C., & Alier, J. M. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.017 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Self-citationSchandl, H., Hatfield–Dodds, S., Wiedmann, T., Geschke, A., Cai, Y., West, J., Newth, D., Baynes, T., Manfred Lenzen, A., & Owen, A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.100 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
95/03845 Industrial metabolism: Restructuring for sustainable development
(1995) · Fuel and Energy Abstracts · doi:10.1016/0140-6701(95)92730-1 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Is Decoupling GDP Growth from Environmental Impact Possible?
Ward, J. D., Sutton, P. C., Werner, A. D., Costanza, R., Mohr, S. H., & Simmons, C. T. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164733 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Managing Without Growth: Slower by Design, Not Disaster
Victor, P. A. (2008) · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world
Anderson, K. L., & Bows‐Larkin, A. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0290 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Gough, I. R. (2017) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781785365119 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Prosperity without growth? : the transition to a sustainable economy
Jackson, T. (2009) · Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Victor, P. A. (2008) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781848442993 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries
Heck, V., Gerten, D., Lucht, W., & Popp, A. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Bank, W. (2012) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-9551-6 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development
Scott, A. J., & Redclift, M. (1995) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/0959-3780(95)90041-1 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Carbon dioxide capture and storage: issues and prospects
de Coninck, H., & Benson, S. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-032112-095222 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Obersteiner, M., Azar, C., Kauppi, P., Möllersten, K., Moreira, J., Nilsson, S., Read, P., Riahi, K., Schlamadinger, B., Yamagata, Y., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.294.5543.786b · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Kallis, G. (2018) · Agenda Publishing eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv5cg82g · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationSocially Sustainable Economic De‐growth
Alier, J. M. (2009) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01618.x · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver
Vaughan, N. E., & Gough, C. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095003 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Possible Target Corridor for Sustainable Use of Global Material Resources
Bringezu, S. (2015) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources4010025 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Giljum, S., Dittrich, M., Lieber, M., et al. (2014) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources3010319 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Australia is ‘free to choose’ economic growth and falling environmental pressures
Hatfield–Dodds, S., Schandl, H., Adams, P., Baynes, T., Brinsmead, T. S., Bryan, B. A., Chiew, F. H. S., Graham, P., Grundy, M., Harwood, T., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16065 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing
Brock, G. (2018) · International Dialogue · doi:10.32873/uno.dc.id.8.1.1157 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Growth theory and ‘green growth’
Smulders, S., Toman, M., & Withagen, C. (2014) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/gru027 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Dematerialization: Not Just a Matter of Weight
van der Voet, E., van Oers, L., & Nikolić, I. (2004) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/1088198043630432 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption
Herring, H., & Sorrell, S. (2009) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230583108 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Turner, A. J., Jacob, D. J., Benmergui, J., Wofsy, S. C., Maasakkers, J. D., Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., & Biraud, S. C. (2016) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2016gl067987 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Bows‐Larkin, A., Kuriakose, J., Sharmina, M., & Anderson, K. (2017) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2017.1346498 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed
van Vuuren, D. P., Hof, A. F., van Sluisveld, M. A. E., & Riahi, K. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0055-2 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Jacobs, M. R. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118326213.ch12 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Radical dematerialization and degrowth
Kallis, G. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0383 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the Economic Value of Ecosystem Services
Sagoff, M. (2008) · Environmental Values · doi:10.3197/096327108x303873 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Is the end of the world at hand?
Solow, R. M. (1973) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02214-4_2 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Holz, C., Siegel, L. S., Johnston, E., Jones, A. P., & Sterman, J. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Is the End of the World at Hand?
Solow, R. M. (1973) · Challenge · doi:10.1080/05775132.1973.11469961 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Palmer, G. (2013) · SpringerBriefs in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02940-5 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
(2016) · Zed Books Ltd · doi:10.5040/9781350220553 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Green growth: ideology, political economy and the alternatives
(2016) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.197392 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Sinks, Energy Crops and Land Use: Coherent Climate Policy Demands an Integrated Analysis of Biomass
Keith, D. W. (2001) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1010617015484 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Gutowski, T., Cooper, D., & Sahni, S. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0368 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Louden, R. B. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195321371.001.0001 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A Critique of the Australian National Outlook Decoupling Strategy: A ‘Limits to Growth’ Perspective
Alexander, S., Rutherford, J., & Floyd, J. (2017) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.014 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Peak planet: are we starting to consume less?
Pearce, F. (2012) · The New Scientist · doi:10.1016/s0262-4079(12)61566-8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Sustainable growth revisited: technology, economics and policy
Ekins, P. (2011) · Mineral Economics · doi:10.1007/s13563-011-0013-6 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
How not to argue against growth
O'Neill, J. C. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315542126-12 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Dittrich M., 2012, Green economies around the world: implications of resource use for development and the environment
- IPCC, 2018, Global warming of 1.5C – summary for policymakers
- Kuhnhenn K., 2018, Economic growth in mitigation scenarios: a blind spot in climate science
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2011, Towards green growth
- Polimeni J.M., 2008, The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2011, Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication – a synthesis for policy makers
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2017, Assessing global resource use
- Weizsäcker E.U., 1998, Factor four: doubling wealth, halving resource use. Club of Rome
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification
Hickel, J. (2021) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Self-citationPost-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries
Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00310-3 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Self-citationHickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., & Zoomkawala, H. (2022) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00044-4 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Self-citationGreening extractivism: Environmental discourses and resource governance in the 'Lithium Triangle'
Voskoboynik, D. M., & Andreucci, D. (2022) · Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486211006345 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries
Tian, P., Zhong, H., Chen, X., Feng, K., Sun, L., Zhang, N., Shao, X., Liu, Y., & Hubacek, K. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08154-w · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Peak oil and the low-carbon energy transition: A net-energy perspective
Delannoy, L., Longaretti, P.-Y., Murphy, D. J., & Prados, E. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117843 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Sustainability in computing education: A systematic literature review
Peters, A.-K., Capilla, R., Coroamă, V. C., Heldal, R., Lago, P., Leifler, O., Moreira, A., Fernandes, J. P., Penzenstadler, B., Porras, J., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3639060 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The globalization of artificial intelligence: consequences for the politics of environmentalism
Dauvergne, P. (2021) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1785670 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Insolvent: How to Reorient Computing for Just Sustainability
Becker, C. (2023) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14668.001.0001 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The Political Ecology of Bolivia’s State-Led Lithium Industrialization for Post-Carbon Futures
Al Bouchi, Y., & Caraway, B. R. (2024) · Capitalism Nature Socialism · doi:10.1080/10455752.2023.2197245 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hickel, J., & Kallis, G.
- Affiliations
- Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Hickel, Jason
- Venue
- New Political Economy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-04-17
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 469-486
- ISSN
- 1356-3467 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9923
- OpenAlex
- W2937421004
- Semantic Scholar
- df80eb282c979258557be6398a34e185207d98ee
- Cited by
- 2,007
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 306 · 2025: 379 · 2024: 345 · 2023: 354 · 2022: 255 · 2021: 212 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 31
- FWCI
- 193.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ddd.uab.cat
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- New Political Economy (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Goldsmiths Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (CSO2017-88212-R, MDM2015-0552)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- green growth, decoupling, economic growth, resource utilization (natural resources), CO2 emissions, climate policy, Sustainable Development Goals, technological change, global warming, economic growth and environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review