Digital twins based day-ahead integrated energy system scheduling under load and renewable energy uncertainties
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
You et al. demonstrated that implementation of a Digital Twin model reduces additional operational costs by 63.5%.
“Their study demonstrated that the implementation of a Digital Twin model reduces additional operational costs by 63.5%.”
From Analysis of Digital Twin Applications in Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- [1][1] Skarvelis-Kazakos S, Papadopoulos P, Grau Unda I, Gorman T, Belaidi A, Zigan S. Multiple energy carrier optimisation with intelligent agents. Applied Energy 2016; 167:323-35. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.130 . - · DOI
- [2][2] Wang H, Gu C, Zhang X, Li F. Optimal CHP planning in integrated energy systems considering network charges. IEEE Systems Journal 2020; 14(2):2684-93. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2921218 . - · DOI
- [3][3] Moeini-Aghtaie M, Dehghanian P, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Abbaspour A. Multiagent genetic algorithm: an online probabilistic view on economic dispatch of energy hubs constrained by wind availability. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2014; 5(2):699-708. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2013.2271517 . - · DOI
- [4][4] Darbali-Zamora R, Johnson J, Summers A, Jones CB, Hansen C, Showalter C. State estimation-based distributed energy resource optimization for distribution voltage regulation in telemetry-sparse environments using a real-time digital twin. Energies 2021; 14(3). doi: 10.3390/en14030774 . - · DOI
- [5][5] Barricelli BR, Casiraghi E, Fogli D. A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE Access 2019; 7:167653-7. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953499 . - · DOI · Paper page
- [7][7] Xiang Y, Cai H, Gu C, Shen X. Cost-benefit analysis of integrated energy system planning considering demand response. Energy 2020; 192:116632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116632 . - · DOI
- [9][9] Ge S, Xu Z, Liu H, Gu C, Li F. Flexibility evaluation of active distribution networks considering probabilistic characteristics of uncertain variables. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 2019; 13(14):314857. doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0181 . - · DOI
- [10][10] Liu F, Bie Z, Wang X. Day-ahead dispatch of integrated electricity and natural gas system considering reserve scheduling and renewable uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2018; 10(2):646-58. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2843121 . - · DOI
- [11][11] Salkuti SR. Day-ahead thermal and renewable power generation scheduling considering uncertainty. Renewable energy 2019; 131:95665. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.106 . - · DOI
- [12][12] Fan C, Wang J, Gang W, Li S. Assessment of deep recurrent neural network-based strategies for short-term building energy predictions. Applied Energy 2019; 236:700-10. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.004 . - · DOI
- [13][13] Theocharides S, Makrides G, Livera A, Theristis M, Kaimakis P, Georghiou GE. Day-ahead photovoltaic power production forecasting methodology based on machine learning and statistical post-processing. Applied Energy 2020; 268:115023. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115023 . - · DOI
- [14][14] Zhu C, Tian W, Yin B, Li Z, Shi J. Uncertainty calibration of building energy models by combining approximate bayesian computation and machine learning algorithms. Applied Energy 2020; 268:115025. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115025 . - · DOI
- [15][15] Zhang L, Wen J, Li Y, Chen J, Ye Y, Fu Y, et al. A review of machine learning in building load prediction. Applied Energy 2021; 285:116452. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116452 . - · DOI
- [16][16] Teo T, Logenthiran T, Woo WL, Abidi K. Near-optimal day-ahead scheduling of energy storage system in grid-connected microgrid. In: Proc. IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia. Singapore; 2018, p. 1257-61. doi: 10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2018.8467921 . - · DOI
- [17][17] Zhou M, Wang B, Watada J. Deep learning-based rolling horizon unit commitment under hybrid uncertainties. Energy 2019; 186:115843. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.173 . - · DOI
- [18][18] Zhang C, Li R, Shi H, Li F. Deep learning for day-ahead electricity price forecasting. IET Smart Grid 2020; 3(4):462-9. doi: 10.1049/iet-stg.2019.0258 . - · DOI
- [19][19] Agostinelli S, Cumo F, Guidi G, Tomazzoli C. Cyber-Physical Systems Improving Building Energy Management: Digital Twin and Artificial Intelligence. Energies 2021; 14(8):2338. doi: 10.3390/en14082338 . - · DOI
- [20][20] Edward O'D, Indranil P, Richard C, Sarah B, Nilay S. Integration of an energy management tool and digital twin for coordination and control of multi-vector smart energy systems. Sustainable Cities and Society 2020; 62:102412. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102412 . - · DOI
- [21][21] Sutskever I, Martens J, Dahl G, Hinton G. On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning. Atlanta, USA; 2013, p. 1139-47. -
- [22][22] Gelaˇ zanskas L, Gamage KA. Forecasting hot water consumption in residential houses. Energies 2015; 8(11):12702-17. doi: 10.3390/en81112336 . - · DOI
- [23][23] Balint A, Kazmi H. Determinants of energy flexibility in residential hot water systems. Energy and Buildings 2019; 188:286-96. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.016 . - · DOI
- [25][25] Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In: Proc. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, San Diego, CA, USA. 2015, p. 1-15.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of Digital Twin Applications in Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Review
Ba, L., Tangour, F., El Abbassi, I., & Absi, R. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17083560 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- You, M., Wang, Q., Sun, H., Castro, I., & Jiang, J.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Northumbria University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Hongjian
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 305
- Pages
- 117899
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3201716575
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dro.dur.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Energy (publishedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Keywords
- digital twin, integrated energy systems, day-ahead scheduling, load uncertainty, renewable energy uncertainty, multi-vector energy systems, deep neural network, operational cost reduction, electric vehicles, thermal energy storage, forecast error, decarbonization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review