Cited by 25Innovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsWireless Power Transfer Systems

Crank shaft road electromagnetic road energy harvester for smart city applications

Open access
Zabihi, Niloufar, Gu, Zewen, Saafi, Mohamed·2023·Applied Energy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122020

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing electromagnetic energy harvesters suffer from excessive volume and low power density.

    “Existing electromagnetic energy harvesters suffer from excessive volume and low power density [23,26].”

    From A Green Electromagnetic Energy Harvester with Up-Frequency and Unidirectional Rotation for Smart Pavement (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    Section 5.5 describes the proposed electromagnetic road harvester as compact compared with other designs, and Section 5.1 says earlier designs require substantially more vertical displacement. This lends some support to the size concern, but the paper does not establish that existing harvesters have excessive volume or low power density; Section 5.5 says their power output is likewise at the watt level. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zabihi, N., Gu, Z., & Saafi, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Zabihi, Niloufar
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
352
Pages
122020
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387207827
Cited by
25
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (765057)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
Keywords
electromagnetic energy harvesting, crankshaft, smart cities, low-power sensors, IoT power supply, speed bumps, vibration energy harvesting, LED lighting, energy storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review