Shoulder muscle loading and task performance for overhead work on ladders versus Mobile Elevated Work Platforms
Open accessAbstract
A high incidence of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) has been reported in the construction sector. The use of ladders in the workplace has long been identified as a significant risk that can lead to workplace accidents. However, it is unclear if platform types have an effect on the physical risk factors for MSDs in overhead work. The aim of this study is to perform a pilot study on the effects of hand activity on both shoulder muscle loading and task performance while working on ladders versus Mobile Elevated Working Platforms (MEWPs). It is hypothesised that work on ladders would result in greater muscle loading demands, increased levels of discomfort, and reduced performance due to the restrictions on postures that could be adopted. A field study (n = 19) of experienced electricians on a construction site found that workers spent approximately 28% of their working time on ladders versus 6% on MEWPs. However, the durations of individual tasks were higher on MEWPs (153 s) than on ladders (73 s). Additionally, maximum levels of perceived discomfort (on a VAS 0-100) were reported for the shoulders (27), neck (23), and lower regions of the body (22). A simulated study (n = 12) found that task performance and discomfort were not significantly different between platform types (ladder vs. MEWP) when completing either of three tasks: cabling, assembly and drilling. However, platform and task had significant effects (p < 0.05) on median electromyographic (EMG) activity of the anterior deltoid and upper trapezius. EMG amplitudes were higher for the deltoid than the upper trapezius. For the deltoid, the peak amplitudes were, on average, higher for ladder work over MEWP work for the hand intensive cabling (32 vs. 27% Maximal Voluntary Exertion (MVE)) and the assembly task (19 vs. 6% MVE). Conversely, for drilling, the peak EMG amplitudes were marginally lower for ladder compared to the MEWP (3.9 vs. 5.1% MVE). The general implication was that working on the MEWP involved lower shoulder muscle loading for cabling and assembly task. A difference due to platform type was not present for drilling work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Workers who lift and transport heavy loads are highly susceptible to MSDs.
“trabajadores que levantan y transportan cargas pesadas, son altamente susceptibles a MSDs [28], [29].”
From Impact of ergonomics on work performance in the manufacturing industry: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of ergonomics on work performance in the manufacturing industry: A systematic review
Campos-Naval, J. E., Castañeda-López, V. A., & Aparicio-Ballena, J. A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 23rd LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI): "Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Sustainable Technologies in service of society" · doi:10.18687/laccei2025.1.1.802
- Authors
- Phelan, D., & O'Sullivan, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Limerick (IE)
- ORCID
- O'Sullivan, Leonard
- Venue
- Applied Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1384-1391
- ISSN
- 0003-6870 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017255182
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
- Keywords
- overhead work, ladders, musculoskeletal disorders, construction workers, electricians, task performance, perceived discomfort, anterior deltoid, upper trapezius, electromyography, hand activity, cabling, assembly, drilling
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Electromyography, Equipment and Supplies, Humans, Ergonomics, Ireland, Male, Muscle Contraction, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Occupational Diseases, Posture, Shoulder, Task Performance and Analysis, Muscle, Skeletal, Construction Industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review