Cited by 0Occupational Health and Safety ManagementErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Impact of ergonomics on work performance in the manufacturing industry: A systematic review

Open access
Campos-Naval, Jose Elvis, Castañeda-López, Victor Alonso, Aparicio-Ballena, Jorge Alberto·2025·Proceedings of the 23rd LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI): "Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Sustainable Technologies in service of society"

Abstract

This systematic study examines the impact of ergonomics on job performance within the manufacturing sector.Originating in the 1940s, ergonomics has established itself as a vital discipline aimed at adapting work environments to huma n capabilities; its proper implementation not only prevents musculoskeletal injuries but also enhances efficiency, elevates work quality, and promotes employee well-being.Through an in-depth review of sources such as Scopus, 36 pertinent studies published between 2014 and 2024 were selected, offering robust evidence on how ergonomic interventions can positively transform workplace conditions.Findings reveal that inadequate application of ergonomic principles may lead to health issues, including muscular discomfort and elevated stress levels, which adversely affect work productivity.Most research focuses on large manufacturing industries, where lumbar and upper limb injuries are prevalent.To assess workplace performance, the most commonly used instruments were questionnaire s and performance records, which have proven effective in identifying ergonomic risks.Furthermore, the importance of implementing ergonomic adjustments grounded in scientific research is emphasized to improve working conditions.Ultimately, effective ergo nomics management not only benefits workers' health but also enhances profitability and sustainability for manufacturing enterprises.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review synthesizes 36 Scopus-indexed studies from 2014–2024 on ergonomics and work performance in manufacturing. It concludes that ergonomic interventions can reduce musculoskeletal problems and improve productivity and well-being, but the evidence is skewed toward large manufacturers and limited by language and database scope.

Key findings

  • Musculoskeletal disorders were the main ergonomic problem, especially in the lumbar region, shoulders, and arms, with additional effects on the neck, wrists, and lower limbs. Poor ergonomics was linked to awkward postures, repetitive movements, excessive physical load, and poor workstation design, as well as environmental and organizational stressors such as noise, vibration, heat, job stress, insufficient breaks, and intense work pace.
  • Study settings were unevenly distributed: more than 18 studies took place in manufacturing plants, 11 in construction, 4 in the electrical sector, and 3 in footwear and textile industries. China produced 15 publications and the United States 8.
  • The most frequently used assessment tools were questionnaires and performance records, which helped identify ergonomic risks. The review also notes use of technical sheets, sampling, electromyography, and accelerometry in some studies.
  • The paper reports that ergonomic management can benefit worker health while also supporting profitability and sustainability in manufacturing firms.

Methods

  • Systematic review using PRISMA and a PICO-based search strategy, centered on how ergonomics influences work performance in manufacturing companies.
  • Search was conducted in Scopus for studies published between 2014 and 2024 in English or Spanish, using a title-abstract-keyword equation combining work environment/ergonomics terms with job performance/productivity terms and manufacturing/industry terms.
  • The PRISMA flow reports 622 records identified, 407 removed as ineligible, 215 reviewed, 87 excluded, 128 main articles, 25 not retrieved, 103 examined, and 36 meeting inclusion criteria. Exclusion reasons included 42 for criterion 1, 1 for criterion 2, 14 for criterion 3, and 10 for criterion 4.

Limitations

  • The paper states that most included studies focused on large manufacturing plants, while small and medium-sized enterprises were underrepresented, limiting generalizability. It also states that the review was restricted to English and Spanish publications, potentially missing relevant evidence in other languages, and that its originality is limited because many prior reviews exist on the topic.
  • The paper recommends future work with other languages (French, German, Chinese) and databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore), more robust experimental designs, and long-term evaluation of ergonomic interventions.
  • Evident from the text: the review presents counts and a narrative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis or pooled effect estimate, and it relies heavily on heterogeneous study designs and self-reported instruments.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18687/laccei2025.1.1.802

Cites

1 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

28 of 46 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Designing ergonomic workspaces reduces the risk of musculoskeletal injuries (MSDs).

    “Entre las áreas de interés destacadas por las fuentes, se encuentra la importancia de diseñar espacios de trabajo ergonómicos para reducir el riesgo de lesiones musculoesqueléticas (LME) [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] 11. W. Septiani, V. Angelika, and N. Rahmawati, "Ergonomic Workspace Design to Reduce the Risk of Musculoskeletal Disorders," E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 500, pp. 1-9, 2024, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202450003045. source
    • cites [12] 12. M. Brandt et al., "Participatory intervention with objectively measured physical risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in the construction industry: Study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders," BMC Musculoskelet Disord, vol. 16, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0758-0. source

      The Background (page unavailable) identifies physical workplace demands as risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders and reports that a participatory intervention reduced physical workload. It does not establish that designing ergonomic workspaces reduces musculoskeletal injuries; this paper is a study protocol, not a report of that outcome. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [13] 13. G. V Shinde, "" Ergonomic analysis of an assembly workstation to identify time consuming and fatigue causing factors using application of motion study " "Ergonomic analysis of an assembly workstation to identify time consuming and fatigue causing factors using applicat," 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279203456

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Musculoskeletal injuries (MSDs) represent one of the main problems derived from deficient working conditions.

    “destacándose las lesiones musculoesqueléticas (MSD) representan uno de los principales problemas derivados de condiciones laborales deficientes [8], [14], [26].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] 8. A. Ahmad, I. Javed, U. Abrar, A. Ahmad, N. R. Jaffri, and A. Hussain, "Investigation of ergonomic working conditions of sewing and cutting machine operators of clothing industry," Industria Textila, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 309-314, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.35530/IT.072.03.1723. source
    • cites [14] 14. B. G. Vidyadhar, S. S. Hebbal, and S. M. Qutubuddin, "Ergonomic risk identification and postural analysis in electrical transformers manufacturing company located in Southern India," Int J Occup Saf Health, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 144-151, 2024, doi: 10.3126/ijosh.v14i2.53692. source
    • cites [26] 26. M. H. Nabi, P. Kongtip, S. Woskie, N. Nankongnab, D. Sujirarat, and S. Chantanakul, "Factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders among female readymade garment workers in bangladesh: A comparative study between osh compliant and non-compliant factories," Risk Manag Healthc Policy, vol. 14, pp. 1119-1127, 2021, doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S297228. source
  • Premisecitation

    Ergonomics has proven essential for the sustainable development of the manufacturing industry.

    “La ergonomía, entendida como la disciplina que estudia la relación entre las personas y los componentes de los sistemas de trabajo, ha demostrado ser esencial para el desarrollo sostenible de la industria manufacturera [1], [2], [3].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] 1. J. A. E. Eklund, "Ergonomics and Quality Managem ent -Humans in Interaction With Technology , Work Environment , and Organization Today , quality is regarded as a m anagement strategy . In particular , strategy with the purpose of satisfying the interest groups mentioned ," vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 143-160, 1999.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [2] 2. Jesus Solano Cuyubamba, "ergonomia y productividad," industrial data, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 48-50, Jul. 1999.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [3] 3. O. Wagdi and S. Sayed, "An analytical study of the work environment in industrial companies: Evidence from Arab countries," Cogent Soc Sci, vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2175489. source

      Section 2.1 (page not provided) defines ergonomics in terms of safe, comfortable human–system interaction and says poor ergonomics can impair task performance and harm workers. It does not establish that ergonomics has proven essential to the sustainable development of the manufacturing industry. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Environmental factors such as temperature, noise, and lighting conditions are determinants in fatigue and stress scales.

    “Factores como la temperatura, el ruido y las condiciones lumínicas son considerados determinantes en las escalas de fatiga y estrés [18], [19], [20], [21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] 18. R. Amalia, M. Ushada, and A. P. Pamungkas, "Development of Artificial Neural Networks Model to Determine Labor Rest Period Based on Environmental Ergonomics," International Journal of Technology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1019-1028, 2023, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v14i5.3854. source

      The Introduction (page not available in our copy) says high-temperature work can cause muscle fatigue and heat stress. Section 2.1 identifies temperature, humidity, and wind velocity as workstation-environment parameters, but the paper does not establish noise or lighting as determinants or discuss fatigue and stress scales. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] 19. L. Rios, A. O. Paggiaro, and R. A. Quintella Fernandes, "Quality of life, lifestyle, and working environment of women in the footwear industry," Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 390-398, 2019, doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2020-517. source

      The Results (Tables 1 and 4; page unavailable) list fatigue and stress as self-reported morbidities and examine workplace noise against quality-of-life domains, not fatigue or stress scales. Searches for temperature, lighting, and environmental determinants of fatigue or stress found no passage establishing the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [20] 20. I. M. Ramdan, K. P. Candra, and U. R. Mahdiyyah, "Fatigue on oil refinery workers and related factors," Open Access Maced J Med Sci, vol. 9, pp. 887-894, 2021, doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.6879. source

      The Introduction (page not available) lists temperature, noise, and light level as environmental factors contributing to work fatigue; the “Noise and heat stress exposure and WRF” section reports significant relationships for noise and high temperatures. The paper does not establish that these factors determine stress-scale scores, and it does not report a measured relationship between lighting and fatigue. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    Workers who lift and transport heavy loads are highly susceptible to MSDs.

    “trabajadores que levantan y transportan cargas pesadas, son altamente susceptibles a MSDs [28], [29].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28] 28. L.-K. Lunde, M. Koch, K. B. Veiersted, G.-H. Moen, M. Wærsted, and S. Knardahl, "Heavy physical work: Cardiovascular load in male construction workers," Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 13, no. 4, 2016, doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040356. source
    • cites [29] 29. D. Phelan and L. O'Sullivan, "Shoulder muscle loading and task performance for overhead work on ladders versus Mobile Elevated Work Platforms," Appl Ergon, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1384-1391, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.03.007. source
  • May combine two claims. 22
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Participatory ergonomic interventions optimize physical conditions and foster greater commitment and job satisfaction.

    “Este enfoque participativo no solo optimiza las condiciones corporales, sino que igualmente fomenta un mayor compromiso y satisfacción laboral.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] 1. J. A. E. Eklund, "Ergonomics and Quality Managem ent -Humans in Interaction With Technology , Work Environment , and Organization Today , quality is regarded as a m anagement strategy . In particular , strategy with the purpose of satisfying the interest groups mentioned ," vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 143-160, 1999.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [12] 12. M. Brandt et al., "Participatory intervention with objectively measured physical risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in the construction industry: Study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders," BMC Musculoskelet Disord, vol. 16, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0758-0. source

      The Background (page unavailable) reports reduced physical workload in a prior participatory intervention and says participatory approaches can increase employee ownership and support. It does not report greater job satisfaction. This paper is a study protocol, so it also does not establish that its proposed intervention improved physical conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [16] 16. S. Eaves, D. E. Gyi, and A. G. F. Gibb, "Building healthy construction workers: Their views on health, wellbeing and better workplace design," Appl Ergon, vol. 54, pp. 10-18, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.004. source

      The Introduction describes benefits for workplace and equipment design and gives examples of participatory changes that improve posture, supporting the physical-conditions part. It also describes encouraging worker engagement, but neither the Introduction nor the Conclusions establishes that participatory interventions increase job satisfaction or sustained job commitment. The paper presents potential benefits rather than showing that interventions consistently optimize conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Inadequate postures, repetitive activity, and use of weights are important risk factors in the industry.

    “Estos estudios, que incluyen evaluaciones posturales con métodos como OWAS y REBA, demuestran que las posturas inadecuadas, de actividad repetitiva y el uso de pesos, son factores de riesgo importantes en la industria [3].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] 3. O. Wagdi and S. Sayed, "An analytical study of the work environment in industrial companies: Evidence from Arab countries," Cogent Soc Sci, vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2175489. source

      Section 2.1, “Physical work environment” (page not supplied), links poor industrial ergonomics and manual handling to physical stress and possible musculoskeletal injury. It does not identify repetitive activity or the use of weights specifically as risk factors, and it does not report postural evaluations using OWAS or REBA. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Studies on ergonomics and work performance use surveys, technical records, and sampling to identify risks and design improvements.

    “Los estudios sobre ergonomía y rendimiento laboral utilizan encuestas para captar la percepción de los trabajadores [12], [17], [23], [30], [35], fichas técnicas para registrar datos del entorno laboral [8], [12], [34] y muestreo para garantizar resultados representativos [28], [34].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. M. Brandt et al., "Participatory intervention with objectively measured physical risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in the construction industry: Study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders," BMC Musculoskelet Disord, vol. 16, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0758-0. source

      Methods > Data describes questionnaires about workplace conditions, and Methods > Phase 1 describes technical measurements used to identify excessive physical load and guide improvements. Methods > Study population and Sample size discuss recruitment and generalizability, but do not say sampling guarantees representative results. The paper describes instrument measurements, not technical record sheets for documenting the work environment. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] 17. M. Rostami, A. Choobineh, M. Shakerian, M. Faraji, and H. Modarresifar, "Assessing the effectiveness of an ergonomics intervention program with a participatory approach: ergonomics settlement in an Iranian steel industry," Int Arch Occup Environ Health, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 953-964, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01811-x. source
    • cites [23] 23. N. A. S. M. Nizam and S. N. S. Ramlee, "Ergonomic Risk Factors and Job Performance of Electronic Employee in Malaysia," Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 112-118, 2024, doi: 10.47836/mjmhs.20.1.15. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A deficient work environment adversely influences general well-being and work aptitude, increasing the risk of accidents and diseases.

    “Los estudios señalan que un entorno de trabajo deficiente influir de manera adversa en el bienestar general y en la aptitud de trabajo, incrementando el riesgo de accidentes y enfermedades [3], [19].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] 3. O. Wagdi and S. Sayed, "An analytical study of the work environment in industrial companies: Evidence from Arab countries," Cogent Soc Sci, vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2175489. source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) links a poor work environment to stress, declining health and reduced work performance. Section 2.1 (page unavailable) describes injuries and illnesses associated with poor ergonomics and harsh working conditions, but does not specifically say that a deficient work environment increases the risk of accidents. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] 19. L. Rios, A. O. Paggiaro, and R. A. Quintella Fernandes, "Quality of life, lifestyle, and working environment of women in the footwear industry," Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 390-398, 2019, doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2020-517. source

      The Conclusions state that the work environment negatively affected the footwear workers’ quality of life, and the Discussion links unsafe environments to low productivity and chronic disease. The paper also reports reduced work capacity, but does not establish that a deficient work environment caused it. Its Discussion associates a possible increase in accidents with prolonged combined work and household workloads, rather than with the work environment specifically. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    MSDs are especially frequent in manufacturing industries and extend to various labor groups.

    “Además, no se limitan únicamente a estos sectores corporales, ya que su incidencia se extiende a diversos grupos laborales, siendo especialmente frecuentes en industrias manufactureras [26], [27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [26] 26. M. H. Nabi, P. Kongtip, S. Woskie, N. Nankongnab, D. Sujirarat, and S. Chantanakul, "Factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders among female readymade garment workers in bangladesh: A comparative study between osh compliant and non-compliant factories," Risk Manag Healthc Policy, vol. 14, pp. 1119-1127, 2021, doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S297228. source

      The Discussion reports MSD prevalence among garment, steel, bank, and office workers, supporting the claim that MSDs affect diverse occupational groups. It reports high prevalence among garment and steel workers but does not establish that MSDs are especially frequent in manufacturing compared with other industries. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [27] 27. A. V. Bataller-Cervero, C. Cimarras-Otal, L. E. Roche-Seruendo, A. Alcázar-Crevillén, J. A. Villalba-Ruete, and C. Berzosa, "Static balance modification during the workday in assembly chain workers with and without current low back pain," Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 17, no. 20, pp. 1- 11, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207385. source

      The Introduction says MSDs affect workers across all types of jobs and sectors, and reports a high prevalence of low back pain in metal-working and other employment sectors. It does not establish that MSDs as a whole are especially frequent in manufacturing compared with other industries. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The adoption of ergonomic practices in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) is usually reactive, limiting the scope of its benefits and perpetuating suboptimal working conditions.

    “Sin embargo, la realidad en pequeñas y medianas empresas (PYMES) revela que la adopción de prácticas ergonómicas suele ser reactiva, limitando el alcance de sus beneficios y perpetuando condiciones laborales subóptimas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] 6. A. Y. Aragón-Vásquez, E. D. Silva-Lugo, J. A. Nájera-Luna, J. Méndez- González, F. J. Hernández, and R. de la Cruz-Carrera, "Postural analysis of the forestry worker in sawmills of El Salto, Durango, Mexico," Madera y Bosques, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1-13, 2019, doi: 10.21829/myb.2019.2531904. source

      The Introduction (page not provided) says ergonomics tends to be used reactively, after injuries occur, rather than proactively to prevent them. It discusses sawmills, not SMEs generally, and does not establish that reactive adoption limits the benefits of ergonomics or perpetuates suboptimal working conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    MSDs predominantly affect the lumbar zone, shoulders, and arms, but also impact other body areas such as neck, wrists, and lower extremities.

    “Estas lesiones afectan predominantemente la zona lumbar, los hombros y los brazos [8], aunque también impactan otras áreas del cuerpo, como el cuello, las muñecas y las extremidades inferiores [8], [16], [27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] 8. A. Ahmad, I. Javed, U. Abrar, A. Ahmad, N. R. Jaffri, and A. Hussain, "Investigation of ergonomic working conditions of sewing and cutting machine operators of clothing industry," Industria Textila, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 309-314, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.35530/IT.072.03.1723. source
    • cites [16] 16. S. Eaves, D. E. Gyi, and A. G. F. Gibb, "Building healthy construction workers: Their views on health, wellbeing and better workplace design," Appl Ergon, vol. 54, pp. 10-18, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.004. source

      Section 4.1.1 and Tables 3–5 report symptoms in the lower back, shoulders, elbows, neck, wrists/hands, knees and ankles/feet. They do not support the claimed predominance of the shoulders and arms: Section 4.1.2 identifies wrists/hands, lower back and knees as particularly prevalent among electricians, and the tables generally show higher prevalence in wrists/hands and knees than in shoulders or elbows. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [27] 27. A. V. Bataller-Cervero, C. Cimarras-Otal, L. E. Roche-Seruendo, A. Alcázar-Crevillén, J. A. Villalba-Ruete, and C. Berzosa, "Static balance modification during the workday in assembly chain workers with and without current low back pain," Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 17, no. 20, pp. 1- 11, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207385. source

      The Introduction describes low back pain as a common recurrent MSD among workers and notes its high prevalence in metal-working environments. It mentions repetitive upper-limb movements, but does not say MSDs predominantly affect the shoulders or arms, or establish effects on the neck, wrists, or lower extremities. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Inadequate postures, repetitive movements, excessive physical load, and inappropriate workstation design contribute to musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and injuries, especially in back, shoulders, and extremities.

    “Entre los principales problemas ergonómicos se encuentran las posturas inadecuadas, los movimientos repetitivos, la carga física excesiva y el diseño inapropiado de los puestos de trabajo, que contribuyen a dolores musculoesqueléticos, fatiga y lesiones, especialmente en áreas como la espalda, los hombros y las extremidades [9], [30], [31].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] 9. J. Brosche, H. Wackerle, P. Augat, and H. Lödding, "Individualized workplace ergonomics using motion capture," Appl Ergon, vol. 114, p. 104140, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104140. source
    • cites [30] 30. H. Ge, X. Sun, J. Liu, and C. Zhang, "The status of musculoskeletal disorders and its influence on the working ability of Oilworkers in Xinjiang, China," Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 15, no. 5, 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050842. source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) links repetitive work, incorrect postures and heavy lifting to musculoskeletal disorders; the Discussion links sustained load and poor posture to pain, fatigue and tissue damage. The Results report symptoms in the back, shoulders and extremities. The paper refers broadly to unergonomic working conditions but does not specifically identify inappropriate workstation design as a contributing factor. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [31] 31. J. Bodin, R. Garlantézec, N. Costet, A. Descatha, J.-F. Viel, and Y. Roquelaure, "Shoulder pain among male industrial workers: Validation of a conceptual model in two independent French working populations," Appl Ergon, vol. 85, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103075. source

      The Introduction (page not provided in our copy) associates repetitive work, forceful exertion, and awkward arm postures with shoulder pain. It does not support the broader claims about inappropriate workstation design or pain, fatigue, and injuries in the back and extremities. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Ergonomics plays a determining role in reducing musculoskeletal injuries and improving work performance.

    “Los resultados de esta revisión confirman que la ergonomía desempeña un papel determinante en la reducción de lesiones musculoesqueléticas y en la mejora del rendimiento laboral [1], [36].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] 1. J. A. E. Eklund, "Ergonomics and Quality Managem ent -Humans in Interaction With Technology , Work Environment , and Organization Today , quality is regarded as a m anagement strategy . In particular , strategy with the purpose of satisfying the interest groups mentioned ," vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 143-160, 1999.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [36] 36. O. K. Ornek and M. N. Esin, "Effects of a work-related stress model based mental health promotion program on job stress, stress reactions and coping profiles of women workers: a control groups study," BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09769-0. source

      The Discussion (page not available) reports that a stress-management programme improved job performance and reduced physical stress reactions among women textile workers. The Methods describe stress-management training and relaxation exercises, not an ergonomics intervention; the paper does not report a reduction in musculoskeletal injuries. It therefore supports the work-performance part, but not the claim about ergonomics preventing those injuries. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most research focuses on large manufacturing industries, where lumbar and upper limb injuries are prevalent.

    “Most research focuses on large manufacturing industries, where lumbar and upper limb injuries are prevalent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Inadequate application of ergonomic principles may lead to health issues, including muscular discomfort and elevated stress levels, which adversely affect work productivity.

    “Findings reveal that inadequate application of ergonomic principles may lead to health issues, including muscular discomfort and elevated stress levels, which adversely affect work productivity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    More than 18 studies were conducted in manufacturing plants, 11 in construction, 4 in electrical, and 3 in footwear and textile industries.

    “más de 18 trabajos se llevaron a cabo en diferentes plantas manufactureras, mientras que en el sector de la construcción se concretaron un total de 11 análisis, en tanto que en el ámbito eléctrico se efectuaron 4 evaluaciones y los restantes 3 estudios correspondieron a las industrias de calzado y textil.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Questionnaires and performance records are the most commonly used instruments to assess workplace performance, and they have proven effective in identifying ergonomic risks.

    “To assess workplace performance, the most commonly used instruments were questionnaire s and performance records, which have proven effective in identifying ergonomic risks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Environmental factors such as noise, vibrations, and high temperatures, along with organizational conditions such as work stress, lack of adequate breaks, and intense work rhythms, exacerbate these risks.

    “Asimismo, factores ambientales como ruido, vibraciones y altas temperaturas, junto con condiciones organizacionales como el estrés laboral, la falta de pausas adecuadas y ritmos de trabajo intensos, exacerban estos riesgos [32], [33], [34].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [32] 32. L. Han et al., "Quality of life and influencing factors of coal miners in Xuzhou, China," J Thorac Dis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 835-844, 2018, doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.14. source
    • cites [33] 33. K. O. Roper and D. C. Yeh, "Ergonomic solutions for an aging workforce," Jul. 17, 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1108/14725960710775054. source
    • cites [34] 34. M. L. C. Comper, P. R. da Silva, A. W. de Negreiros, C. C. Villas Bôas, and R. S. Padula, "Influence of adherence to autonomous job rotation on musculoskeletal symptoms, occupational exposure, and work ability," Int J Ind Ergon, vol. 84, no. April 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103165. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most included studies focus on large manufacturing plants, while SMEs are underrepresented.

    “la mayoría de los estudios incluidos se centran en grandes plantas manufactureras, mientras que las PYMES, a pesar de su peso en la economía, están subrepresentadas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    China has 15 publications, the United States has 8 publications, and other nations contribute with lower frequency.

    “China sobresale con un total de 15 publicaciones, reflejado en la tonalidad más intensa del gráfico.”
    • Also stated in: § III. RESULTADOS · plain
      “Estados Unidos continúa con un registro de 8 publicaciones, señalado mediante un matiz azul más tenue.”
    • Also stated in: § III. RESULTADOS · plain
      “Otras naciones también contribuyen a la producción académica, aunque con una frecuencia menor que no se detalla de forma individual en el mapa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    36 pertinent studies published between 2014 and 2024 were selected from Scopus for the review.

    “Through an in-depth review of sources such as Scopus, 36 pertinent studies published between 2014 and 2024 were selected”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Proper implementation of ergonomics prevents musculoskeletal injuries, enhances efficiency, elevates work quality, and promotes employee well-being.

    “its proper implementation not only prevents musculoskeletal injuries but also enhances efficiency, elevates work quality, and promotes employee well-being.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Effective ergonomics management benefits workers' health and enhances profitability and sustainability for manufacturing enterprises.

    “Ultimately, effective ergo nomics management not only benefits workers' health but also enhances profitability and sustainability for manufacturing enterprises.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This gap limits the generalization of results and suggests the need to broaden the analysis to other productive and cultural contexts.

    “Esta brecha limita la generalización de los resultados y sugiere la necesidad de ampliar el espectro de análisis hacia otros contextos productivos y culturales.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Ergonomics is an essential pillar for guaranteeing safe and productive working conditions.

    “La ergonomía es un pilar esencial para garantizar condiciones laborales seguras y productivas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A registry was carried out in the scientific database Scopus, considering research disseminated between 2014 and 2024, in English or Spanish.

    “se llevó a cabo un registro en la base científica Scopus, considerando investigaciones difundidas entre 2014 y 2024, en idioma inglés o español.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The review was restricted to publications in English and Spanish, which could have left out relevant evidence available in other languages.

    “la revisión se restringió a publicaciones en inglés y español, lo que podría haber dejado fuera evidencia relevante disponible en otros idiomas”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The PRISMA technique was used for the collection of studies.

    “Se empleo la técnica PRISMA para la recopilación de estudios.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Its application not only reduces the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries but also contributes to improving employee well-being and the profitability of companies.

    “Su aplicación no solo reduce la incidencia de lesiones musculoesqueléticas, sino que también contribuye a mejorar el bienestar de los empleados y la rentabilidad de dichas empresas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The discarded writings were classified as 42 by exclusion criterion 1, 1 by criterion 2, 14 by criterion 3, and 10 by criterion 4.

    “Los escritos descartados se clasificaron de la manera siguiente: 42 por el criterio de exclusión 1 (CE1), 1 por el criterio de exclusión 2 (CE2), 14 por el criterio de exclusión 3 (CE3) y 10 por el criterio de exclusión 4 (CE4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The search strategy was designed following the PICO framework.

    “La estrategia de búsqueda se diseñó siguiendo el marco PICO”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The integration of complementary methodologies, such as motion capture systems, can provide more complete and personalized evaluations.

    “La integración de metodologías complementarias, como sistemas de captura de movimiento, puede proporcionar evaluaciones más completas y personalizadas [23], [35].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] 23. N. A. S. M. Nizam and S. N. S. Ramlee, "Ergonomic Risk Factors and Job Performance of Electronic Employee in Malaysia," Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 112-118, 2024, doi: 10.47836/mjmhs.20.1.15. source
    • cites [35] 35. N. Gupta, C. D. Wåhlin-Jacobsen, J. S. Abildgaard, L. N. Henriksen, K. Nielsen, and A. Holtermann, "Effectiveness of a participatory physical and psychosocial intervention to balance the demands and resources of industrial workers: A cluster-randomized controlled trial," Scand J Work Environ Health, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 58-68, 2018, doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3689. source
28 of 28
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The included studies are sufficiently homogeneous to be synthesized into general conclusions about ergonomics and work performance in manufacturing.

    “Estas 36 investigaciones fueron incorporadas en la revisión sistemática.”
1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Construction studies conflict with the stated inclusion criterion

    Major

    The inclusion criterion requires studies of ergonomics and work performance in manufacturing, but the results count 11 construction-sector studies among the reviewed studies.

  • Study counts exceed the 36 included studies

    Minor

    The categories are presented as a breakdown of the included studies. More than 18 manufacturing studies, plus 11 construction, 4 electrical and 3 remaining studies, totals at least 37-not 36.

2 of 2

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]1. J. A. E. Eklund, "Ergonomics and Quality Managem ent -Humans in Interaction With Technology , Work Environment , and Organization Today , quality is regarded as a m anagement strategy . In particular , strategy with the purpose of satisfying the interest groups mentioned ," vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 143-160, 1999.
  2. [2]2. Jesus Solano Cuyubamba, "ergonomia y productividad," industrial data, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 48-50, Jul. 1999.
  3. [9]9. J. Brosche, H. Wackerle, P. Augat, and H. Lödding, "Individualized workplace ergonomics using motion capture," Appl Ergon, vol. 114, p. 104140, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104140. · DOI · Paper page
  4. [13]13. G. V Shinde, "" Ergonomic analysis of an assembly workstation to identify time consuming and fatigue causing factors using application of motion study " "Ergonomic analysis of an assembly workstation to identify time consuming and fatigue causing factors using applicat," 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279203456

Authors
Campos-Naval, J. E., Castañeda-López, V. A., & Aparicio-Ballena, J. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the 23rd LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI): "Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Sustainable Technologies in service of society"
Published
2025
OpenAlex
W7084083664
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
human factors, employee performance, manufacturing industry, musculoskeletal injuries, occupational health, labor productivity, employee well-being, ergonomic interventions, working conditions, upper extremity injuries, lumbar spine injury, occupational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review