The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Technological advances have led to physiological measurement being increasingly used to measure and predict operator states. Mental workload (MWL) in particular has been characterised using a variety of physiological sensor data. This systematic review contributes a synthesis of the literature summarising key findings to assist practitioners to select measures for use in evaluation of MWL. We also describe limitations of the methods to assist selection when being deployed in applied or laboratory settings. We detail fifty-eight peer reviewed journal articles which present original data using physiological measures to include electrocardiographic, respiratory, dermal, blood pressure and ocular. Electroencephalographic measures have been included if they are presented with another measure to constrain scope. The literature reviewed covers a range of applied and experimental studies across various domains, safety-critical applications being highly represented in the sample of applied literature reviewed. We present a summary of the six measures and provide an evidence base which includes how to deploy each measure, and characteristics that can affect or preclude the use of a measure in research. Measures can be used to discriminate differences in MWL caused by task type, task load, and in some cases task difficulty. Varying ranges of sensitivity to sudden or gradual changes in taskload are also evident across the six measures. We conclude that there is no single measure that clearly discriminates mental workload but there is a growing empirical basis with which to inform both science and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use
Malik, M., Bigger, J. T., Camm, A. J., Kleiger, R. E., Malliani, A., Moss, A. J., & Schwartz, P. J. (1996) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868 · Cited by 15,289
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Physiological workload reactions to increasing levels of task difficulty
VELTMAN, J. A., & GAILLARD, A. W. K. (1998) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/001401398186829 · Cited by 433 · cited 10×
“Veltman and Gaillard (1998) observed a systematic decrease in NN intervals as a task became more difficult during a simulated flight task.”
BackgroundInfluentialXie, B., & Salvendy, G. (2000) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/026783700417249 · Cited by 247
Nickel, P., & Nachreiner, F. (2003) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.45.4.575.27094 · Cited by 167
Fournier, L. R., Wilson, G. F., & Swain, C. R. (1999) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(98)00049-x · Cited by 158
Level of operator control and changes in heart rate variability during simulated flight maintenance.
Tattersall, A. J., & Hockey, G. R. J. (1995) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095778995517 · Cited by 126
Grassmann, M., Vlemincx, E., von Leupoldt, A., & Van den Bergh, O. (2017) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.09.006 · Cited by 45
Cited by
A Systematic Review of Physiological Measures of Mental Workload
Tao, D., Tan, H., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Qu, X., & Zhang, T. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16152716 · Cited by 303
EEG power spectral measures of cognitive workload: A meta‐analysis
Chikhi, S., Matton, N., & Blanchet, S. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14009 · Cited by 258
Human Mental Workload: A Survey and a Novel Inclusive Definition
Longo, L., Wickens, C. D., Hancock, G., & Hancock, P. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883321 · Cited by 222
Castro-Alonso, J. C., de Koning, B. B., Fiorella, L., & Paas, F. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9 · Cited by 278
(2025) · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2023.3346205 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Charles, R. L., & Nixon, J.
- Venue
- Applied Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 221-232
- ISSN
- 0003-6870 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2890072046
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028
- The paper
- Charles, R. L., & Nixon, J. (2019). Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review. Applied Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.