Parameters optimization for direct flue gas CO2 capture and sequestration by aqueous mineral carbonation using activated serpentinite based mining residue
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adding a liquid recirculation process in the pilot scale plant reaches a CO2 sequestration efficiency of 0.47 g CO2/g residue, which doubled the value obtained from the optimal conditions in the laboratory scale (0.28 g CO2/g residue).
“Adding a liquid recirculation process in the pilot scale plant seems to be a promising strategy and reaches a CO2 sequestration efficiency of 0.47 g CO2/g residue [117], which doubled the value obtained from the optimal conditions in the laboratory scale (0.28 g CO2/g residue) [101].”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [101]
The CO2 sequestration efficiency of direct aqueous carbonation of thermal-activated serpentine mining residue was enhanced to 0.28 g CO2/g residue after carbonation for 15 min at the optimum condition (T = 22 °C, PCO2 = 0.19 MPa, PCO2:PH2O = 1.8).
“The CO2 sequestration efficiency was enhanced to 0.28 g CO2/g residue after carbonation for 15 min at the optimum condition (T = 22 ◦ C, PCO2 = 0.19 MPa, PCO2 :PH2O = 1.8) [101].”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [101]
Cites
CO2 disposal by means of silicates
SEIFRITZ, W. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/345486b0 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Accelerated carbonation of brucite in mine tailings for carbon sequestration
Harrison, A. L., Power, I. M., & Dipple, G. M. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3012854 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Pasquier, L.-C., Mercier, G., Blais, J.-F., Cecchi, E., & Kentish, S. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405449v · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent developments and challenges of aqueous mineral carbonation: a review
Veetil, S. P., & Hitch, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02776-z · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review
Li, J., Hitch, M., Power, I., & Pan, Y. (2018) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min8040147 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Pasquier, L.-C., Mercier, G., Blais, J.-F., Cecchi, E., & Kentish, S. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405449v · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, W., Chu, G., Yue, H., Liang, B., Luo, D., & Li, C. (2018) · Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data · doi:10.1021/acs.jced.7b01113 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pasquier, L.-C., Mercier, G., Blais, J.-F., Cecchi, E., & Kentish, S.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (CA)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Blais, Jean-François
- Venue
- Applied Geochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 66-73
- ISSN
- 0883-2927 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049948930
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Geochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds Québecois pour la Recherche et les Technologies (FQRNT)
- Carbon Management Canada (CMC)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- CO2 capture, CO2 sequestration, aqueous mineral carbonation, serpentine, mining waste, flue gas, magnesium carbonate precipitation, magnesium leaching, process parameter optimization, alkaline rocks, carbon capture and storage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review