Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating the structure and use of hiking trails in recreational areas using a mixed GPS tracking and graph theory approach

Taczanowska, Karolina, González, Luis-Millán, Garcia-Massó, Xavier, Muhar, Andreas, Brandenburg, Christiane, Toca-Herrera, José-Luis·2014·Applied Geography
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.011

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 71

Metadata

Authors
Taczanowska, K., González, L.-M., Garcia-Massó, X., Muhar, A., Brandenburg, C., & Toca-Herrera, J.-L.
ORCID
Taczanowska, Karolina
Venue
Applied Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
55
Pages
184-192
ISSN
0143-6228
DOI
10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.011
Cited by
71
References
39
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
University of Valencia (UV-INV EPDI13-113269)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the structure and use of hiking trails in recreational areas using a mixed GPS tracking and graph theory approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.011
The paper
Taczanowska, K., González, L.-M., Garcia-Massó, X., Muhar, A., Brandenburg, C., & Toca-Herrera, J.-L. (2014). Evaluating the structure and use of hiking trails in recreational areas using a mixed GPS tracking and graph theory approach. Applied Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.