CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mapping and measuring place attachment

Brown, Greg, Raymond, Christopher M., Corcoran, Jonathan·2015·Applied Geography
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Bricker, 2000, Level of specialization and place attachment: an exploratory study of whitewater recreationists, Leisure Sciences, 22, 233, 10.1080/01490409950202285 · DOI
  2. Brown, 2005, Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications, Society & Natural Resources, 18, 1
  3. Brown, 2013, The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: an empirical analysis, Ecosystem Services, 5, 58, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.004 · DOI
  4. Brown, 2013, Relationships between spatial and non-spatial preferences and place-based values in national forests, Applied Geography, 44, 1, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.008 · DOI
  5. Brown, 2014, Measuring change in place values for environmental and natural resource planning using Public Participation GIS (PPGIS): results and challenges for longitudinal research, Society & Natural Resources, 27, 36, 10.1080/08941920.2013.840023 · DOI
  6. Brown, 2014, Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation, Ecosystem Services
  7. Brown, 2014, Which “public”? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) systems for public lands management, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57, 190, 10.1080/09640568.2012.741045 · DOI
  8. Brown, 2014, Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): a synthesis based on empirical research, Applied Geography, 46, 122, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004 · DOI
  9. Brown, 2007, The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment, Applied Geography, 27, 89, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.11.002 · DOI
  10. Brown, 2014, Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping, Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007 · DOI
  11. Brown, 2009, Public Participation GIS: a new method for national forest planning, Forest Science, 55, 166, 10.1093/forestscience/55.2.166 · DOI
  12. Brown, 2012, Values compatibility analysis: integrating public values in a forest planning decision support system, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 5, 317, 10.1007/s12061-011-9072-x · DOI
  13. Brown, 2002, Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study, Applied Geography, 22, 49, 10.1016/S0143-6228(01)00019-4 · DOI
  14. Brown, 2012, Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS (PPGIS), Applied Geography, 34, 316, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.007 · DOI
  15. Brügger, 2011, One for all? Connectedness to nature, inclusion of nature, environmental identity, and implicit association with nature, European Psychologist, 16, 324, 10.1027/1016-9040/a000032 · DOI
  16. Burgman, 2003, Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning, Animal Conservation, 6, 19, 10.1017/S1367943003003044 · DOI
  17. Burt, 1943, Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals, Journal of Mammalogy, 24, 346, 10.2307/1374834 · DOI
  18. Devine-Wright, 2009, Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 426, 10.1002/casp.1004 · DOI
  19. Gunderson, 2006, Understanding place meanings for wilderness: personal and community values at risk, International Journal of Wilderness, 12, 27
  20. Hammitt, 2004, Experience use history, place bonding and resource substitution of trout anglers during recreation engagements, Journal of Leisure Research, 36, 356, 10.1080/00222216.2004.11950028 · DOI
  21. Hammitt, 2009, Comparison of place bonding models in recreation resource management, Journal of Leisure Research, 41, 57, 10.1080/00222216.2009.11950159 · DOI
  22. Hidalgo, 2001, Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273, 10.1006/jevp.2001.0221 · DOI
  23. Kyle, 2005, Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings, Environment and Behavior, 37, 153, 10.1177/0013916504269654 · DOI
  24. Lin, 2014, Forms and sources of place attachment: evidence from two protected areas, Geoforum, 53, 74, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.008 · DOI
  25. Manzo, 2005, For better or worse: exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 67, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.01.002 · DOI
  26. Mayer, 2004, The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Moore, 1994, Attachments to recreation settings: the case of rail-trail users, Leisure Sciences, 16, 17, 10.1080/01490409409513214 · DOI
  28. Patterson, 2005, Maintaining research traditions on place: diversity of thought and scientific progress, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 361, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.10.001 · DOI
  29. Pocewicz, 2013, Preferences of Wyoming residents for siting of energy and residential development, Applied Geography, 43, 45, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.06.006 · DOI
  30. Powell, 2012, What is a home range?, Journal of Mammalogy, 93, 948, 10.1644/11-MAMM-S-177.1 · DOI
  31. Proshansky, 1983, Place-identity: physical world socialization of the self, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57, 10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8 · DOI
  32. Raymond, 2013, Vol. 34(3), 345
  33. Raymond, 2011, Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2513, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.015 · DOI
  34. Raymond, 2010, The measurement of place attachment: personal, community and environmental connections, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 422, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.002 · DOI
  35. Schreyer, 1981, Environmental meaning as a determinant of spatial behaviour in recreation, vol. 4, 294
  36. Schultz, 2004, Implicit connections with nature, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31, 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7 · DOI
  37. Sherrouse, 2011, A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services, Applied Geography, 31, 748, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002 · DOI
  38. Trentelman, 2009, Place attachment and community attachment: a primer grounded in the lived experience of a community sociologist, Society & Natural Resources, 22, 191, 10.1080/08941920802191712 · DOI
  39. Van Riper, 2014, Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: a spatial analysis, Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 374, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.014 · DOI
  40. Warren, 2005, ‘Green on green’: public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48, 853, 10.1080/09640560500294376 · DOI
  41. Williams, 2014, Making sense of “place”: reflections on pluralism and positionality in place research, Landscape and Urban Planning, 131, 74, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.002 · DOI
  42. Williams, 1992, Beyond the commodity metaphor – examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place, Leisure Sciences, 14, 29, 10.1080/01490409209513155 · DOI
  43. Williams, 2003, The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach, Forest Science, 49, 10.1093/forestscience/49.6.830 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brown, G., Raymond, C. M., & Corcoran, J.
Venue
Applied Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
57
Pages
42-53
ISSN
0143-6228
DOI
10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.011
Cited by
230
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review