Cited by 43Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisGeographic Information Systems StudiesMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the socio-demographic representativeness of mobile phone application data

Open access

Abstract

Emerging forms of mobile phone data generated from the use of mobile phone applications have the potential to advance scientific research across a range of disciplines. However, there are risks regarding uncertainties in the socio-demographic representativeness of these data, which may introduce bias and mislead policy recommendations. This paper addresses the issue directly by developing a novel approach to assessing socio-demographic representativeness, demonstrating this with two large independent mobile phone application datasets, Huq and Tamoco, each with three years data for a large and diverse city-region (Glasgow, Scotland) home to over 1.8 million people. We advance methods for detecting home location by including high-resolution land use data in the process and test representativeness across multiple dimensions. Our findings offer greater confidence in using mobile phone app data for research and planning. Both datasets show good representativeness compared to the known population distribution. Indeed, they achieve better population coverage than the ‘gold standard’ random sample survey which is the alternative source of data on population mobility in this region. More importantly, our approach provides an improved benchmark for assessing the quality of similar data sources in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102997

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These representativeness and exclusion factors can affect the absolute levels of mobility observed and the proportional presence of different mobility types.

    “These factors can affect the absolute levels of mobility observed and the proportional presence of different mobil-ity types (Sinclair et al. 2023).”

    From Visitation patterns across mobility groups: wandering, commuting, and exploring (2026) · cites this paper as Sinclair et al. 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2021, SHSScottish household survey, 1999-Scottish Household Survey
  2. Wakefield, 2021, Location data collection firm admits privacy breach, BBC News

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sinclair, M., Maadi, S., Zhao, Q., Hong, J., Ghermandi, A., & Bailey, N.
Affiliations
  • Urban Big Data Centre (GB)
  • University of Seoul (KR)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Sinclair, Michael
Venue
Applied Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
158
Pages
102997
ISSN
0143-6228 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384162608
Cited by
43
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Geography (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/S007105/1, ES/L011921/1, ES/W012979/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Keywords
data bias, land use data, population coverage, human mobility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review