Cited by 29Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Using the number needed to treat in clinical practice

Weeks, Douglas L., Noteboom, J.Timothy·2004·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

The number needed to treat (NNT) is gaining attention as a method of reporting the results of clinical trails with dichotomous outcome measures. The NNT is defined as the number of patients who would need to be treated, on average, with a specific intervention to prevent 1 additional bad outcome or to achieve 1 desirable outcome in a given time period. Because it reports outcomes in terms of patient numbers, it is extremely useful to clinicians for making decisions about the effort expended with a particular intervention to achieve a single positive outcome. This special communication describes the NNT statistic and its utility for choosing clinical interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.025

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weeks, D. L., & Noteboom, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Inland Northwest Health Services (US)
  • Regis University (US)
Corresponding author
Weeks, Douglas L.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
85
Issue
10
Pages
1729-1731
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137227357
Cited by
29
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePublications at Regis University (Regis University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
number needed to treat, clinical trial reporting, binary outcomes, treatment decision-making, clinical intervention, patient numbers
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Research Design, Confidence Intervals, Sample Size, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review