The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the FIM Instrument in Patients With Stroke
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6 · Cited by 4,982
Users' guides to the medical literature
Guyatt, G. H. (1993) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.270.17.2096 · Cited by 2,970
Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories.
Ross, M. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.96.2.341 · Cited by 1,564
The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review
Ottenbacher, K. J., Hsu, Y., Granger, C. V., & Fiedler, R. C. (1996) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90184-7 · Cited by 1,411
Dodds, T. A., Martin, D. P., Stolov, W. C., & Deyo, R. A. (1993) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90119-u · Cited by 1,048
(1975) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197507312930513 · Cited by 1,017
Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies
Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., & Matchar, D. B. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-v · Cited by 932
Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?
Slevin, M., Plant, H., Lynch, D., Drinkwater, J., & Gregory, W. (1988) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1988.20 · Cited by 904
Deyo, R. A., & Centor, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(86)90038-x · Cited by 792
Cited by
Miller, E. L., Murray, L., Richards, L., Zorowitz, R. D., Bakas, T., Clark, P., & Billinger, S. A. (2010) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0b013e3181e7512b · Cited by 758
Tilson, J. K., Sullivan, K. J., Cen, S. Y., Rose, D. K., Koradia, C. H., Azen, S. P., Duncan, P. W., & for the Locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke (LEAPS) Investigative Team (2010) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20090079 · Cited by 494
Cook, J., Hislop, J., Adewuyi, T., Harrild, K., Altman, D., Ramsay, C., Fraser, C., Buckley, B., Fayers, P., Harvey, I., et al. (2014) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta18280 · Cited by 194
Bondanelli, M., Ambrosio, M. R., Cavazzini, L., Bertocchi, A., Zatelli, M. C., Carli, A., Valle, D., Basaglia, N., & Uberti, E. C. D. (2007) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2007.0343 · Cited by 104
Self-Efficacy, Poststroke Depression, and Rehabilitation Outcomes: Is There a Correlation?
Torrisi, M., De Cola, M. C., Buda, A., Carioti, L., Scaltrito, M. V., Bramanti, P., Manuli, A., De Luca, R., & Calabrò, R. S. (2018) · Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.07.021 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Beninato, M., Gill-Body, K. M., Salles, S., Stark, P. C., Black-Schaffer, R. M., & Stein, J.
- Venue
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-39
- ISSN
- 0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011156586
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the FIM Instrument in Patients With Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130
- The paper
- Beninato, M., Gill-Body, K. M., Salles, S., Stark, P. C., Black-Schaffer, R. M., & Stein, J. (2006). Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the FIM Instrument in Patients With Stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
