Cited by 67Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutHealth, psychology, and well-being

Are cognitive–behavioral interventions effective in reducing occupational stress among nurses?

Orly, Sarid, Rivka, Berger, Rivka, Eckshtein, Dorit, Segal-Engelchin·2012·Applied Nursing Research

Abstract

Despite the growing evidence regarding the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral interventions in reducing occupational stress, very few studies have examined its effectiveness among nurses. This study investigated the impact of a cognitive-behavioral (CB) course on the nurses' well-being. The study compared the sense of coherence (SOC), perceived stress (PSS), and mood states of 20 nurses who had participated in the CB course to that of 16 control participants using a pre-post test design. At baseline (t1), no significant differences were found between the two groups in SOC, PSS, and mood states. The effects within each group controlling for t1 were examined by analysis of covariance. At t2, a significant increase in SOC and the mood state of vigor and a significant decrease in PSS and fatigue were found only among participants in the CB course. The results are discussed in relation to the conceptual framework of stress and coping theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apnr.2011.01.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Burnout among healthcare professionals is significantly associated with suicidal ideation, decreased job satisfaction, increased turnover intention, loss of healthcare professionals, and deterioration in quality of care, patient safety, and health status.

    “Burnout among HPs is significantly associated with suicidal ideation [7], decreased job satisfaction [8], and increased turnover intention, ultimately resulting in a loss of HPs and deterioration in the quality of care, which is also negatively affected, as is patient safety and health status [9,10,11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orly, S., Rivka, B., Rivka, E., & Dorit, S.-E.
Affiliations
Soroka Medical Center (IL)
Venue
Applied Nursing Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
152-157
ISSN
0897-1897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102969220
Cited by
67
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
cognitive-behavioral intervention, occupational stress, nurses, sense of coherence, perceived stress, mood states, vigor, fatigue, stress and coping theory, nurse well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Staff Development, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Occupational Exposure, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review