Cited by 141Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy-related medical research

The effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following childbirth: an experimental study

Gökçe İsbir, Gözde, İnci, Figen, Önal, Hatice, Yıldız, Pelin Dıkmen·2016·Applied Nursing Research

Abstract

Background Fear of birth and low childbirth self-efficacy is predictive of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms following childbirth. The efficacy of antenatal education classes on fear of birth and childbirth self-efficacy has been supported; however, the effectiveness of antenatal classes on post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after childbirth has received relatively little research attention. Purpose This study examined the effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms following childbirth. Design Quasi-experimental study. Methods The study was conducted in a city located in the Middle Anatolia region of Turkey and data were collected between December 2013 and May 2015. Two groups of women were compared-an antenatal education intervention group (n=44), and a routine prenatal care control group (n=46). The Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire, Version A and B, Childbirth Self-efficacy Inventory and Impact of Event Scale-Revised was used to assess fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and PTSD symptoms following childbirth. Results Compared to the control group, women who attended antenatal education had greater childbirth self-efficacy, greater perceived support and control in birth, and less fear of birth and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms following childbirth (all comparisons, p<0.05). Conclusions Antenatal education appears to alleviate post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after childbirth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apnr.2016.07.013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gökçe İsbir, G., İnci, F., Önal, H., & Yıldız, P. D.
Affiliations
Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi (TR)
Venue
Applied Nursing Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
32
Pages
227-232
ISSN
0897-1897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2490458887
Cited by
141
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Niğde Üniversitesi Açık Erişim Sistemi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
prenatal education, fear of childbirth, childbirth self-efficacy, post-traumatic stress disorder, postpartum PTSD, childbirth experience, prenatal care, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Fear, Female, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Turkey, Parturition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review