Cited by 229Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psycho‐Education Intervention by Midwives in Reducing Childbirth Fear in Pregnant Women

Open access
Toohill, Jocelyn, Fenwick, Jennifer, Gamble, Jenny, Creedy, Debra K., Buist, Anne, Turkstra, Erika, Ryding, Elsa‐Lena·2014·Birth

Abstract

Background: Childbirth fear is associated with increased obstetric interventions and poor emotional and psychological health for women. The purpose of this study is to test an antenatal psycho‐education intervention by midwives in reducing women's childbirth fear. Methods: Women ( n = 1,410) attending three hospitals in South East Queensland, Australia, were recruited into the BELIEF trial. Participants reporting high fear were randomly allocated to intervention ( n = 170) or control ( n = 169) groups. All women received a decision‐aid booklet on childbirth choices. The telephone counseling intervention was offered at 24 and 34 weeks of pregnancy. The control group received usual care offered by public maternity services. Primary outcome was reduction in childbirth fear ( WDEQ ‐A) from second trimester to 36 weeks’ gestation. Secondary outcomes were improved childbirth self‐efficacy, and reduced decisional conflict and depressive symptoms. Demographic, obstetric & psychometric measures were administered at recruitment, and 36 weeks of pregnancy. Results: There were significant differences between groups on postintervention scores for fear of birth ( p < 0.001) and childbirth self‐efficacy ( p = 0.002). Decisional conflict and depressive symptoms reduced but were not significant. Conclusion: Psycho‐education by trained midwives was effective in reducing high childbirth fear levels and increasing childbirth confidence in pregnant women. Improving antenatal emotional well‐being may have wider positive social and maternity care implications for optimal childbirth experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/birt.12136

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences 1988 Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum Associates Vol. 2nd.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toohill, J., Fenwick, J., Gamble, J., Creedy, D. K., Buist, A., Turkstra, E., & Ryding, E.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Toohill, Jocelyn
Venue
Birth
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-09
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
384-394
ISSN
  • 0730-7659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-536X
OpenAlex
W1978374197
Cited by
229
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Birth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1025099)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
fear of childbirth, psychoeducation, midwives, antenatal interventions, childbirth self-efficacy, decisional conflict, depressive symptoms, telephone counseling, obstetric surgery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Counseling, Decision Support Techniques, Depression, Fear, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Parturition, Young Adult, Prenatal Education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review