Unwanted online sexual solicitation and risky sexual online behavior across the lifespan
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Young people who access the internet most frequently have a greater probability of experiencing sexual solicitations online.
“Young people who access the internet most frequently have a greater probability of experiencing sexual solicitations online (Baumgartner et al., 2010;De Graaf & Vanwesenbeeck, 2006;Mitchell et al., 2001).”
From A review of young people's vulnerabilities to online grooming (2013) · cites this paper as Baumgartner et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 92 · Cited by 166
- Authors
- Baumgartner, S. E., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Baumgartner, Susanne E.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 439-447
- ISSN
- 0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976946300
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Keywords
- adolescents, adulthood, gender differences, perceived benefits and risks, age differences, cyber victimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
