Cited by 299Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Perceived healthiness of food. If it's healthy, you can eat more!

Provencher, Véronique, Polivy, Janet, Herman, C. Peter·2009·Appetite

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to investigate the effects of food-related beliefs about the healthiness of foods, restrained eating, and weight salience on actual food intake during an ad libitum snack. In a 2 (healthy vs. unhealthy) by 2 (restrained vs. unrestrained eaters) by 2 (weight salient vs. not salient) factorial design, 99 female undergraduate students were invited to taste and rate oatmeal-raisin cookies. Dietary restraint and weight salience did not influence snack intake, but participants ate about 35% more when the snack was regarded as healthy than when it was seen as unhealthy. Ratings of the snack food's "healthiness," "capacity to affect weight" and "appropriateness in a healthy menu" also indicated that the "healthy" manipulation was effective. In addition, the "weight salience" manipulation appears to influence perceptions about food differently in restrained versus unrestrained eaters, in that restrained eaters rated the snack food more negatively than unrestrained eaters did when they received weight feedback before eating. Beliefs about the healthiness of foods may thus be of great relevance to both food intake and weight gain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Provencher, V., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Provencher, Véronique
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
340-344
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039801188
Cited by
299
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
dietary restraint, dietary intake, snacking, ad libitum feeding, food perception, weight gain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attitude, Energy Intake, Culture, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Health Status, Humans, Hunger, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Control, Formal, Taste, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review