Cited by 135Thermoregulation and physiological responsesNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorElectrolyte and hormonal disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Should children drink more water?

Open access
Edmonds, Caroline J., Burford, Denise·2009·Appetite

Abstract

While dehydration has well-documented negative effects on adult cognition, there is little research on hydration and cognitive performance in children. We investigated whether having a drink of water improved children's performance on cognitive tasks. Fifty-eight children aged 7-9 years old were randomly allocated to a group that received additional water or a group that did not. Results showed that children who drank additional water rated themselves as significantly less thirsty than the comparison group (p=0.002), and they performed better on visual attention tasks (letter cancellation, p=0.02; spot the difference memory tasks, ps=0.019 and 0.014).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2009.02.010

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–135 of 135

Metadata

Authors
Edmonds, C. J., & Burford, D.
Affiliations
University of East London (GB)
Corresponding author
Edmonds, Caroline J.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
776-779
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W195970758
Cited by
135
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
Keywords
hydration, water intake, children, cognitive performance, visual attention, thirst perception, memory
MeSH terms
Attention, Body Water, Child, Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Cognition, Dehydration, Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Psychometrics, Task Performance and Analysis, Thirst, Vision, Ocular, Water-Electrolyte Balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review