Cited by 118Eating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and ObesityOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Males and females show differential brain activation to taste when hungry and sated in gustatory and reward areas

Open access
Haase, Lori, Green, Erin, Murphy, Claire·2011·Appetite

Abstract

Although males and females differ in eating behavior and prevalence rates for eating disorders and obesity, little is known about gender differences in cortical activation to pleasant and unpleasant pure tastes during the physiological states of hunger and satiety. Twenty-one healthy young adults (12 females and 9 males) underwent two functional magnetic resonance imaging scans. Using four pure tastants of differing qualities (i.e., salty, sour, bitter, sweet), the present study examined gender differences in fMRI activation during two motivational states (hunger and satiety). There was greater change in fMRI activation from hunger to satiety in males than females in response to all tastes within the middle frontal gyrus (BA 10), insula, and cerebellum. Males also had greater change in activation from hunger to satiety, relative to females, in limbic regions including dorsal striatum, amygdala, parahippocampal gyrus, and posterior and anterior cingulate; however, activation was stimulus dependent, despite equivalent ratings in perceived pleasantness and intensity. Interestingly, males and females showed significant change from hunger to satiety in response to citric acid, suggesting that in addition to gender and physiological condition, stimulus quality is an important factor in taste fMRI activation. These gender differences may have implications for the pathophysiology of eating disorders and obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2011.06.009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 119 · Cited by 118

Authors
Haase, L., Green, E., & Murphy, C.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Claire
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
421-434
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980992098
Cited by
118
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG04085-24, R01AG004085)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
gender differences, hunger, satiety, taste perception, brain activation, gustatory cortex, reward processing, limbic system, insula, middle frontal gyrus, citric acid, eating disorders, obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Brain, Brain Mapping, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Humans, Hunger, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Reward, Satiation, Sex Factors, Taste Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review