School-based intervention with children. Peer-modeling, reward and repeated exposure reduce food neophobia and increase liking of fruits and vegetables
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of the 'Food Dudes' school-based intervention consisting of rewards, peer-modeling and food exposure on food neophobia and the liking of fruits and vegetables (FV) in a large cohort of children. Five-hundred sixty children recruited from three schools were assigned to the experimental or control group. For 16 days, children in the experimental group watched motivational videos, were read letters to encourage them to eat FV and received a small reward for eating one portion of both a fruit and a vegetable. The control group was only provided with FV for the same time period. Food neophobia and liking were measured in both groups of children before and after the intervention, and a follow-up measurement was carried out 6 months later. The intervention was effective in reducing food neophobia and, most importantly, a persistent effect was observed 6 months after the intervention as children of the experimental group showed significantly lower neophobia scores than the control group. Additionally, the program was effective in increasing liking for both FV; however, this effect was maintained only for fruit after 6 months.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 168
- Authors
- Laureati, M., Bergamaschi, V., & Pagliarini, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Laureati, Monica
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 26-32
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087531752
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 11.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Regione Lombardia (03012010)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- food neophobia, school-based intervention, peer modeling, food reward, children, motivational videos, fruit consumption, vegetable consumption, long-term intervention effects
- MeSH terms
- Child, Diet, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Fruit, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Motivation, Parents, Peer Group, Personality, Reward, Schools, Vegetables, Health Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review