Cited by 118Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesSensory Analysis and Statistical Methods

Exposure to foods' non-taste sensory properties. A nursery intervention to increase children's willingness to try fruit and vegetables

Open access
Dazeley, Paul, Houston-Price, Carmel·2015·Appetite

Abstract

Activities that engage young children with the sensory properties of foods are popular with nursery schools, despite the lack of evidence for their efficacy in increasing children's consumption of healthy foods. This study provides the first empirical exploration of the effectiveness of a non-taste sensory activity program in a nursery school setting. Ninety-two children aged between 12 and 36 months were allocated either to an intervention group, who took part in looking, listening, feeling and smelling activities with unusual fruits and vegetables every day for 4 weeks, or to a non-intervention control group. In a subsequent mealtime taste test, children touched and tasted more of the vegetables to which they had been familiarized in their playtime activities than of a matched set of non-exposed foods. The results demonstrate that hands-on activities with unfamiliar fruits and vegetables can enhance children's willingness to taste these foods, and confirm the potential for such activities to support healthy eating initiatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.040

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in anticipated liking may follow this approach behaviour in both trial arms.

    “Changes in anticipated liking may follow this approach behaviour in both trial arms (Dazeley & Houston-Price, 2015; Priester et al., 1996).”

    From Children overcoming picky eating (COPE) - A cluster randomised controlled trial. (2020) · cites this paper as Dazeley & Houston-Price, 2015

    The Results report that children in both exposure groups approached previously exposed foods first, supporting the reference to approach behaviour. The paper does not measure anticipated liking or say that changes in liking may follow that behaviour, so it does not support the sentence’s main inference. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 118

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Heath, P. (2013). Improving children's responses to fruit and vegetables. Picture-book exposure and the impact of food familiarity and liking (Ph.D. thesis). University of Reading.
  2. Rozin, P. (1976). The selection of food by rats, humans and other animals. In J. Rosenblatt, R. Hinde, C. Beer, & E. Shaw (Eds.), Advances in the study of behaviour (Vol. 6; pp. 21-76). London/New York: Academic Books.
  3. Thomas, L. (2007). Mange tout. Teaching your children to love fruit and vegetables without tears. London: Penguin.

Authors
Dazeley, P., & Houston-Price, C.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
84
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012631923
Cited by
118
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Reading
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Keywords
food familiarity, healthy eating promotion
MeSH terms
Child Behavior, Child Day Care Centers, Child, Preschool, Diet, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Fruit, Health Promotion, Humans, Infant, Nurseries, Infant, Odorants, Play and Playthings, Schools, Smell, Taste, Touch, Vegetables, Vision, Ocular, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review