The effect of mindfulness on rational thinking
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research showed a significant positive correlation between mindfulness and rational thinking (r = 0.56).
“Consistent with previous research showing a significant positive correlation between mindfulness and rational thinking (r = 0.56)50,51”
From Rational thinking as a mediator of the relationship between mindfulness and dental anxiety (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
Non-judging was not a significant predictor in Farrar et al.'s research.
“Non-judging, was not a significant predictor in Farrar et al.’s51 research”
From Rational thinking as a mediator of the relationship between mindfulness and dental anxiety (2023) · cites this paper as Farrar et al.51
Farrar et al. found that Non-reacting was significantly positively correlated with rationality.
“Non-reacting was significantly positively correlated with rationality according to Farrar et al.51”
From Rational thinking as a mediator of the relationship between mindfulness and dental anxiety (2023) · cites this paper as Farrar et al.51
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rational thinking as a mediator of the relationship between mindfulness and dental anxiety
Yao, J., Carciofo, R., & Pan, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28879-4 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Farrar, S., & Tapper, D. K.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Farrar, Stephanie
- ORCID
- Farrar, Stephanie
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 304
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4235230471
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- mindfulness, rational thinking, decision-making, cognitive function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
