A cross-disciplinary mixed-method approach to understand how food retail environment transformations influence food choice and intake among the urban poor: Experiences from Vietnam
Open accessAbstract
Nutrition insecurity among urban poor in modernizing Asian metropolises is a critical issue. It is well recognized that in urban Asia the poor are food insecure. Across Asia the food retail environment is transforming rapidly, in which supermarkets increasingly replace traditional food vending, like markets and street vendors that the urban poor depend upon. The question is, how these transformations impact the diets of the urban poor? What drives their food choice? What are their daily shopping practices and how does that affect their dietary intake? To investigate this, we developed a cross-disciplinary nutrition and social practices study with a sequential quantitative-qualitative mixed-method design. Building on empirical evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam, the study links (i) food choice and measured dietary intake, with (ii) food retail environment, through (iii) food shopping practices and preferences of 400 women of reproductive age within the context of (iv) their transformative urban lifestyles. Methods included are a retail census with GPS coordinates to map the food retail environment, a household survey, a 24-h diet recall, multi-generation household interviews and shopping trips. We demonstrate that integrated sociological and nutritional perspectives are productive in rapidly generating evidence to comprehend the complex trade-offs between food safety and nutrition in everyday food consumption practices. We describe and reflect on our theoretical mix of dietary intake and social practices research, and our holistic mixed method approach which besides combining quantitative and qualitative methods, also voices the urban poor first hand.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fresh fruits and vegetables, which have been studied elsewhere, have received less attention in Ethiopia.
“The other highly nutritious and equally high-risk food group, fresh fruits and vegetables, which have been studied elsewhere (Wallace, Mittal, Lambertini, & Nordhagen, 2022)through several high-quality studies such as in Vietnam (Wertheim-Heck & Raneri, 2019;Wertheim-Heck, Spaargaren, & Vellema, 2014), have also received less attention in Ethiopia.”
From Food safety-related perspectives and practices of consumers and vendors in Ethiopia: A scoping review. (2022) · cites this paper as Wertheim-Heck & Raneri, 2019
The Scope section confirms that this Vietnam study examined fresh vegetables in depth, supporting its use as an example of research outside Ethiopia. It says the in-depth food-retail data covered vegetables only, so the citation does not establish that this study examined fresh fruits in the same way. The statement about research attention in Ethiopia is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 58
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Moore R. Understanding ‘gentrification’ in southeast and east Asia Vol. 13 2013 Mahidol University, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities Interdisciplinary Studies Journal
- Spaargaren G. Lamers M. Weenink D. Practice Theory and Research. Exploring the dynamics of social life 2016 Routledge Abingdon
- Authors
- Wertheim-Heck, S. C. O., & Raneri, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT (IT)
- ORCID
- Raneri, Jessica E.
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 142
- Pages
- 104370
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6739597
- OpenAlex
- W2959033753
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Department for International Development
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Keywords
- retail food environment, urban poor, nutritional insecurity, food choice, dietary intake, supermarket expansion, street vendors, women of reproductive age, food safety, social practices, Hanoi, Vietnam, 24-hour dietary recall
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Commerce, Consumer Behavior, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Food Supply, Humans, Middle Aged, Poverty, Research Design, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population, Vietnam, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review