Cited by 107Eating Disorders and BehaviorsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A qualitative exploration of the impact of COVID-19 on individuals with eating disorders in the UK

Open access

Abstract

COVID-19 may have substantial impact on the mental health at a population level, but also has the potential to significantly affect those with pre-existing mental health difficulties such as eating disorders. This qualitative study explores the impact of COVID-19 and associated public health measures on adults with eating disorders within the UK. We conducted 10 in depth interviews with adults (24-38 years) with a self-reported eating disorder during lockdown. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. We identified core themes related to social restrictions (social isolation, changes in accountability to others, and increased responsibility for self and others), functional restrictions (lack of routine and structure, a need to intentionally plan activity, a desire for secrecy particularly around food shopping) and restrictions in access to mental health services. Overall, the impact of the lockdown was experienced as a catalyst for either increased disordered eating behaviours or for a drive for recovery, depending on individual circumstances going into these restrictions. This study is the first in depth interview approach with adults with mixed eating disorder presentations in the UK during COVID-19. Findings have important implications for post lockdown intervention care and practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104977

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Manicas, 2009, Realist metatheory and qualitative methods, Sociological Analysis, 3, 31

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–107 of 107

Metadata

Authors
Brown, S., Opitz, M.-C., Peebles, A. I., Sharpe, H., Duffy, F., & Newman, E.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Sharpe, Helen
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
156
Pages
104977
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089040184
Cited by
107
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 35
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, eating disorders, lockdown, social isolation, social restrictions, functional limitations, access to mental health care, disordered eating, recovery, adults
MeSH terms
Social Factors, COVID-19, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Public Health, Social Isolation, Qualitative Research, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review