Human contact and feeding as rewards for the lamb's affinity to their stockperson
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stroking animals in a similar manner to intraspecific allogrooming reduces heart rate and results in relaxed body postures in cattle and lambs.
“For example, studies have also demonstrated that stroking animals in a similar manner to intraspecific allogrooming reduces heart rate and results in relaxed body postures in cattle [22] and lambs [23].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment of positive welfare: a review
Yeates, J. W., & Main, D. C. J. (2008) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.05.009 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“For example, studies have also demonstrated that stroking animals in a similar manner to intraspecific allogrooming reduces heart rate and results in relaxed body postures in cattle [22] and lambs [23].”
A preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo
Hosey, G. (2008) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.013 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tallet, C., Veissier, I., & Boivin, X.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Tallet, Céline
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 59-73
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091611671
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- human-animal bond, lambs, animal handling, feeding behaviour, food conditioning, food motivation, hunger, animal welfare, human-animal contact
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
