Behavioral responses to the zoo environment by white handed gibbons
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Common examples of stereotypies include self-scratching or self-mutilatory behaviour in primates, pacing in carnivores, and oral stereotypies such as non-food object licking in ungulates.
“However, some common examples include self-scratching or self-mutilatory behaviour in primates [54,55,56], pacing in carnivores [57] and oral stereotypies, such as non-food object licking in ungulates [58].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Evidence that zoo visitors influence HPA activity in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyii rufiventris)
Davis, N., Schaffner, C. M., & Smith, T. E. (2005) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.020 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Visitor effects on anxiety in two captive groups of western lowland gorillas
Carder, G., & Semple, S. (2008) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.001 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Queiroz, M. B., & Young, R. J. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8080139 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cooke, C. M., & Schillaci, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Schillaci, Michael A.
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 125-133
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008220508
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Connaught Fund
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Keywords
- white-handed gibbon, Hylobates lar, zoo animal behavior, brachiation, locomotion, communication behavior, captive primates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
