The effects of mixed-species assemblage on the behaviour and welfare of fish held in home aquaria
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aquaria collections are renowned for mixing species in natural interspecific assemblages or habitats, however a lack of welfare understanding is still apparent.
“Sloman et al., (2011) supported this by stating aquaria collections are renowned for mixing species in natural interspecific assemblages or habitats, however a lack of welfare understanding is still apparent.”
From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Sloman et al., (2011)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria
Green, H., Palmer, G. A., & Brereton, J. E. (2022) · Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities · doi:10.56397/jrssh.2022.12.02 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Sloman et al., (2011) supported this by stating aquaria collections are renowned for mixing species in natural interspecific assemblages or habitats, however a lack of welfare understanding is still apparent.”
Background
- Authors
- Sloman, K. A., Baldwin, L., McMahon, S., & Snellgrove, D.
- Affiliations
- University of the West of Scotland (GB)
- University of Plymouth (GB)
- Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sloman, Katherine A.
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 160-168
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125887172
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- WALTHAM Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- fish welfare, ornamental fish, angelfish, Tanichthys albonubes, neon tetra, Paracheirodon innesi, group size, aggression, shoaling behaviour, environmental enrichment, stocking density, species interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review