Cited by 77Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

Cross-sectional study comparing behavioural, cognitive and physiological indicators of welfare between short- and long-term kennelled domestic dogs

Titulaer, Mieke, Blackwell, Emily J., Mendl, Michael, Casey, Rachel A.·2013·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.05.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 77

Authors
Titulaer, M., Blackwell, E. J., Mendl, M., & Casey, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Titulaer, Mieke
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
147
Issue
1-2
Pages
149-158
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036507090
Cited by
77
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dogs Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Keywords
dog welfare, judgment bias, urinary cortisol, affective states, dog behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review