Number of nearby visitors and noise level affect vigilance in captive koalas
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exposure of koalas to 'loud' crowd noise playbacks increased their behaviours indicative of disturbance compared with 'quiet' crowd noise playbacks.
“For example, exposure of koalas to ‘loud’ crowd noise playbacks increased their behaviours indicative of disturbance compared with ‘quiet’ crowd noise playbacks [78].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [78]
Cites
The Effects of Visitor Density and Intensity on the Behavior of Two Captive Jaguars (Panthera onca)
Sellinger, R. L., & Ha, J. C. (2005) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1207/s15327604jaws0804_1 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Visitor effects on zoo orangutans in two novel, naturalistic enclosures
Choo, Y., Todd, P. A., & Li, D. (2011) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.007 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
A Case Study: The Effect of Visitors on Two Captive Pumas With Respect to the Time of the Day
Maia, C. M., Volpato, G. L., & Santos, E. F. (2012) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1080/10888705.2012.683758 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“Others have manipulated visitor noise levels by asking groups to be quiet in the vicinity of target animal enclosures [14,77] or by exposing animals to crowd noise audio recordings and analysing behavioural responses [78].”
BackgroundSelf-citationQueiroz, M. B., & Young, R. J. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8080139 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Larsen, M. J., Sherwen, S. L., & Rault, J.-L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Rault, Jean-Loup
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 154
- Pages
- 76-82
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082985976
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- Phascolarctos cinereus, captive animals, zoo visitors, vigilance behavior, human-animal interaction, animal welfare, behavioral monitoring, stress response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
