Cited by 108Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The Effects of Visitor Density and Intensity on the Behavior of Two Captive Jaguars (Panthera onca)

Sellinger, Rebecca L., Ha, James C.·2005·Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science

Abstract

Several researchers have reported significant effects of visitor density and intensity on captive animal behavior. This study determined whether this was the case for 2 captive jaguars housed at the Woodland Park Zoo, Seattle, WA. Subjects were monitored for changes in behavior as a function of visitor density and intensity. The jaguars were observed for 8 hr per week for 29 weeks--March 31 until October 11, 1998--for a total of 230 hr. Continuous frequency sampling was used, and visitor density and intensity were recorded every minute. Parametric statistics were used to test for correlations between behavior and density, intensity, or a combination of the two. Both density and intensity were significant for time spent non-visible for both cats, and intensity showed a significant effect on the female's pacing behavior. In addition, the male cat exhibited a trend for increased aggression based on both visitor density and intensity and a trend of intensity affecting his social behavior. In conclusion, both density and intensity had a significant effect on behavior, with intensity showing a larger effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327604jaws0804_1

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing visitor numbers were associated with less time visible to the public in orangutans, jaguars and siamangs.

    “increasing visitor numbers were associated with less time visible to the public in a range of species, including orangutans [77], jaguars [84] and siamangs [85].”
  • An increase in time spent engaged in stereotypic behaviour with increased visitor numbers was observed in gorillas, pileated gibbon, jaguar, fennec foxes and brown bears.

    “An increase in time spent engaged in stereotypic behaviour with increased visitor numbers was observed in gorillas [54,93] pileated gibbon [94], jaguar [84], fennec foxes [35] and brown bears [95].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sellinger, R. L., & Ha, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
Published
2005-10
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
233-244
ISSN
  • 1088-8705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7604
OpenAlex
W2136508445
Cited by
108
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
jaguar, captive animal behavior, visitor density, zoo animal welfare, pacing behavior, aggression, social behavior, zoo visitors
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Female, Housing, Animal, Humans, Male, Population Density, Time Factors, Panthera

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review